Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AlexandrB's commentslogin

This is very geography/climate dependent though. There are conditions where most people would not bike regardless of how high quality the bike network is.

The effect is a lot less pronounced that you might expect. See, for example, this video talking about Oulu, Finland: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhx-26GfCBU

Are these conditions that typically can't be found in the Netherlands?

I guess heavy snow isn't too common there, maybe if we plowed the bike paths? Ok, now I'm getting distracted imagining a bike-path-plow, it would presumably be mounted on a powered bike of some sort, or maybe on those little parking enforcement trikes.


Buy a coat and a pair of gloves. You're not made of sugar.

I'm becoming increasingly pessimistic about democracy lately. The average voter will ask for a grab bag of contradictory things and then complain about attempts to deliver any one of them. My local subreddit wants cheap housing but also wants to preserve farmland and maintain historic buildings and welcome more immigrants at the same time.

Yup, can't have your cake and eat it too.

Political choices have trade-offs. We have to give up some things to gain others.

But somehow politicians get away with promising to solve all problems all at once, even though that's clearly impossible.


My gripe is less with democracy and more with the ad-driven economy that has taken over.

The competition is so intense that in order for media to survive now, it needs to relentlessly farm clicks/views. So a story about a datacenter being built near a migratory goose pond carries way more value than the story about the pond actually is a Walmart parking lot runoff pit.

There is like this business game of whoever can fear monger and misinform the most without outright lying wins, and being honest and truthful gets you punished.


A ridiculous gotcha on a site where every other article is about using AI to automate your job, solve frontier math problems, or port old video games to new platforms. So to be clear nothing is our fault here? It's all just about the billionaires "making us" use AI for all these things?

If my government just decided to wire $1B account into my personal account without strings attached I'd 100% accept that in ecstasy. So if I say "spending money this way is unfair" I'm a hypocrite???

Or maybe, just maybe, one can acknowledge that a thing benefits them personally isn't necessarily justified for the whole country or humanity as a whole, and admitting this makes them less hypocritical?


Companies do mandate AI usage from the top, no?

Who mandated people reversing and porting old games for fun in their home?

Pretty much. Mushroom farms smell like shit when the wind turns. Even just normal farms smell like manure at various times of the year. Amazon fulfillment centres are hideous and create a lot of traffic in the surrounding area. There's a reason building industry near residential in the SimCity series causes residential property values to drop.

Marijuana farms in California smell like… you guessed it, marijuana!

Sugarcane processing makes the area smell like baby shit.

lol this is so true i couldn't really pinpoint the smell

Can you elaborate? I'm hearing an awful lot of talk about packing the courts[1] and abolishing the senate[2] from the Democrats. What is Trump proposing that matches those anti-democratic measures?

[1] https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/05/12/...

[2] https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/07/senate-representat...



If only we had access to super intelligent search engines... or we can drip feed a bad faith mook battle

And yet, no one is posting any concrete policies Trump is working on passing in response. Just accusations of "bait" and "bad faith". Alright guys, very convincing.

I don't think you can call bad faith for worrying about the guy who has already been impeached in Congress for inciting insurrection.

Your favorite LLM can find any number of executive orders Trump has signed, bills he's tried to persuade Congress to write and pass, and lawsuits his justice department has filed in pursuit of tipping the scales permanently in favor of himself first and his party second. You don't need anyone to link you to these records for your own edification – or, far more likely, for you to pick at with whataboutism – when you have the power to find it all at your own fingertips.

They're vibecoding.

I think the canned response is more honest, because it's usually trivial to tell that it's canned. Maybe if the AI generated response said it was AI generated it would feel less shitty.

Politically or economically? Because economically Canada is headed to the bottom of the G20.

https://www.bcbc.com/insight/oecd-predicts-canada-will-be-th...


> Are there lots of examples in Canada of basic charter rights being violated in such a manner?

Plenty, it's just usually against unpopular targets. The most notable recent one being the trucker protest[1]. And what were the consequences for those in charge for this charter violation? I believe the answer is "nothing".

So what we have in Canada is a charter that theoretically protects citizens, but in practice can be violated by the government with impunity.

[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/emergencies-act-federal-cou...


I don't understand a bit of your complaint. As you yourself described, the system worked exactly as intended. The government does something illegal, the courts mull over it, and decide that it was, in fact, illegal. The government's currently not doing it.

Surely you can see a difference between an one-off that after the fact was found to be illegal, and hasn't been repeated, versus a pattern of the courts making batshit insane rulings?

Since you think that the truckers had to right to do what they did... If the courts ruled against them, would you have taken that as evidence for the quality of the charter, and the legal system that stands behind it? Or is this a tails I win, heads you lose situation?

No piece of paper can ever prevent a government from doing something illegal, or from passing an illegal law. The courts are only ever an after-the-fact remedy.

In the US, meanwhile, that remedy doesn't even work.


If what the government did was illegal, why were the people responsible not convicted and punished? The truckers who did illegal things got time for it. Even the guy who hacked/leaked the donor list got his conviction.

The charter is meaningless weasel words and is used just as often to curtail the rights of Canadians as it is to protect them.

The situation is exactly "tails I win, heads you lose" but in favour of whoever has the majority of MPs. They can take illegal action to thwart political opponents and face no consequences. Just as how police officers should be punished when they break the law (but often aren't), those who hold political office should be punished when they step outside their bounds.


> If what the government did was illegal, why were the people responsible not convicted and punished?

So, just to clarify, do you believe the executive responsible should go to prison as soon as one of their decisions is found to be illegal?

Or is there a higher bar that needs to be crossed? Where, roughly, would you put this bar?


Citizens do, why should a government employee be given free reign to do illegal things?

> If the courts ruled against them, would you have taken that as evidence for the quality of the charter, and the legal system that stands behind it? Or is this a tails I win, heads you lose situation?

That's a fair point. Though the truckers are just an example.

I just don't think the charter offers guarantees anywhere as strong as the US constitution. For example, Canada's hate speech laws have taken a big chunk out of both the right to free speech and now the freedom of religion[1] set out in the charter.

[1] https://www.cccb.ca/media-release/proposed-restrictions-on-r...


I've given up on all streaming services because none of them offer a model where my money goes to the artists I listen to and not to Taylor Swift and other top-40 nonsense. Switching completely to Plex + PlexAmp + Bandcamp + iTunes purchased music (it's DRM free). It helps that I have ~300 CDs to kick start my library.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: