Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BitWiseVibe's commentslogin

Imagine paying a billion dollars for some contract software devs to add tracking cookies to your websites.


There are a bunch of "emperor's new clothes" companies in the economy today. Palantir certainly seems like one of them.


What does a newspaper need "actionable intelligence" for?


To quote the CEO, "that allows us to engage users more effectively and monetize those relationships faster and at much greater value."

So they view their readers as something to be monetized. Not to be educated, not to be intellectually stimulated, not to have their questions answered, not to have their curiosity satisfied, not to provide them with anything a newspaper traditionally did. Nope, they are just a source of money. Get them to click, serve them an ad, sell their tracking data.


I immediately thought they might be trying to de-anonymize article Commenters. Maybe I'm being too paranoid.


Oh, I'm sure they are doing that too. Something else they think they can monetize (never mind that most of them are probably bots).


Thank you for everything you do Fredrik. Very happy to be a customer of a company that supports freedom and privacy for everyone regardless of views.


> that supports freedom ... for everyone

Unless you happen to be of Somalian descent in Sweden. Then you should be ripped away from the only home you've ever known, indeed possibly the only country you've ever been in, and sent to a foreign country you have no citizenship in, where you have no home, don't understand the language, know no one, and be forced to try and survive.


This is entirely false, not every country is the USA. Sweden does not have birthright citizenship. Most Somalis and their children in Sweden are not Swedish citizens.

To add, they all retain their Somali citizenship.


Nowhere did I say anything about them being Swedish citizens - though I'll note if that distinction mattered at all (it doesn't) "most" wouldn't be good enough.

I said they weren't necessarily Somali citizens. Somali citizenship when born outside the country is more complicated than that and will not be universal.

Either way legal status is just one of many reasons why this would be a horrific crime against humanity requiring prosecution by the Hague under the Rome statutes. You're still ripping an entire ethnic group away from their homes.


>Nowhere did I say anything about them being Swedish citizens - though I'll note if that distinction mattered at all (it doesn't)

It does matter, Somalis are not Swedes. They don't belong in Sweden, much the same as Swedes don't belong in Somalia.

>You're still ripping an entire ethnic group away from their homes.

Sweden is not the home of Somalis.


> don't understand the language

Seriously? It's not like the Somalis have been in Sweden that long.


Their children might not speak their language.


Most of those children wouldn't be able to communicate with their own parents, if that were the case.

Somalis are usually not spread out among the natives. They tend to clump together in ethnic enclaves where it is very easy to learn Somali (and where life is unpleasant for the unfortunate child who doesn't learn it).


And some parents do learn Swedish so their children might not know their parents native language. Or have you inspected every Somalian family in Sweden? It might not be that many, but doesn't make his point any less true.


I'd say it makes it "fewer" true ;)

Surely we can agree that if such kids exist then they must be very, very few in number?


So its okay then I guess?


Do you know of one, or is this some hypothetical think of the children argument to get sympathy?


Not just against it for children, at this point they might be grown up attending university or even working. In theory it would even apply to my colleagues which have become citizens but do not speak Swedish.

I don't believe that integration has worked well either, but it doesn't mean that I think we should "send back" people that were born here and don't have any other citizenship.


But they do.

That's actually one of the biggest problems with mass migration - that all incentives go against integration into the host culture.


Thank you!


It could be automated action based on abuse reports. TONS of spam comes from Railway associated networks.


I work in a security adjacent role and I know we have had a few incidents that involved Railway networks lately. Could be something to that, I don't know


As someone who runs some public APIs, the amount of spam from Railway IPs is insane. They have horrible abuse prevention. Hopefully this encourages them to improve their operations.


This is the conflict at the center of running a hosting company - make it easy to signup and you get a lot of new users but also a lot of abuse.

Implement anti-abuse measures and you will hit some loud false positives (this may be the case with GCP here).

I don't envy anybody running a hosting co - the internet is a really ugly place under the surface.

edit: to add - AWS are really good here. Must be the ~30 years of retail fraud and abuse experience.


Hetzner is famously aggressive with their KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements, often locking new sign-ups and asking for photos of ID.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.


Is it really a false positive if railway lets people run abusive services on GCP and then GCP consequently shuts them down?


the services are running on railways own servers, not gcp


I continue to receive phishing via AWS pretending to be Amazon. And not even the Unicode-lookalike shenanigans that my spam filter refuses for excessive mixed scripts, no; literally claiming to be Amazon as in: the company that operates the relay.


i wonder if DID or World (various ways of Proof of Human) can help solve this issue.


This just incentivizes market for bio-mules, which already exists with world[0] - where prices stay low because it was rolled out to low-income countries.

Then there's the platform game theory. If you adopt you add friction which reduces signups, and there will always be a competitor who would risk the 10x fraud increase in order to capture 100x the market. Railway has seen hyper-growth because it's so easy to run from, and is recommended by, coding agents[1].

The solutions are here already just not well implemented or understood - probabilistic fraud detection, resource limits, service and automation limits, standard gov identity verification as a signal, enterprise sales channels with human relationships, etc.

There are tradeoffs with each platform choice that just aren't well understood. Most users shop on price and DX and don't see the abuse infra or problem until it hits them.

Google and GCP have a problem where they completely cook users who get flagged in their automated fraud net (this isn't news - or shouldn't be)

[0] https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/05/24/black-market-for-...

[1] and the problems that come with providing that simple interface, like sometimes dropping prod


so.. a chromebook with extra ai slop?


NIMBYism comes in all colors


Is it still 'NIMBYism' if what they are building is something that none of the residents want at all? Like yeah no-one wants the new sewage plant in their backyard but they will still see the value in it.

Even as someone in tech I don't see the value in this scale of buildout. This technology is very new and no doubt in my mind that in 5 years we will be able to do everything these models do on a fraction of the resources.


The article comes to a completely incorrect conclusion by fundamentally misunderstanding what moves prices. The price of Bitcoin declines in USD terms when there is more net selling of Bitcoin than buying. If Bitcoin is sold by "crypto bros", only then do they have cash to "[push] up the price of items in short supply, like houses, and tickets to big-name concerts and major sports events". If you wanted the price of other scarce assets to decline, you would hope that more capital flows into Bitcoin or Crypto or something else that you don't care about.


Maybe a government job


I'm curious how the Bitcoin was actually seized, given that the indictment says the perp is still at large and held the Bitcoin in self custodied wallets.


He has the key written on a piece of paper in his wallet. The US government has his wallet. And his Bitcoin.


So he was effectively carrying $15B in his wallet? That's insane. I don't even carry more than $100 cash.


Rookie numbers


> So when I ask them to code switch further into the recesses of linguistic history to read Shakespeare, the struggle is real.

Reading difficult texts is how you get better at reading?? If students are not struggling at all they are not learning. But the author seems more interested in validating students identities or whatever than actually helping them learn.


But Shakespeare is not "difficult", it's just extremely dated. Shakespeare was not at all difficult at the time, most of the plays would have been considered very easily accessible. They have a ton of simple humor and even puns. Most of them are just lost in translation because language has evolved in such a way that much of it no longer works and the cultural references are lost to time.


In the Shakespeare case I’m not even sure reading plays in their entirety is the best way to gain exposure. Plenty of good and reasonably faithful film versions out there.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: