Check out AI-DLC or another structured development workflow for your team and stick to it.
If you’ve got devs: not using any structured workflow, or using a variety (speckit, openspec, superpowers, their own) it’s going to be hard to control the quality of the development process itself and its outputs: you are just producing slop.
What many businesses are going through is the industrialization of software development.
The whole framing analyzing LLMs as if they were humans is completely off, laughable.
LLMs have no agenda and no feelings. We should stop pushing everything through an human-centric lens. LLMs will world-build if that’s the bias you put in, and often even if you don’t.
This article read like Claude output placed inside massive ads. 0 value above telling Claude to summarize the source for me. Except, the source was not linked as article link.
Claude Code let's you add/change it's output style.
On the article: the author seems to be overly sensitive to remarks made by an LLM. Instead of looking inward and finding out why that bothered them in the first place and grow, they "fire" the tool.
If you are just looking to massage the numbers so there are more first homes vs second homes percentage-wise without creating new first homes, then taxing luxury second homes may work. It has great potential to change the numbers on a spreadsheet.
Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.