Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Drawde's commentslogin

http://68k.news/

is also a nice one


This is most likely what is being referenced: https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/Makefile

I like how the includes are separated and commented.

Also if you weren't already familiar with their work you might be interested in giving this a read: https://justine.lol/ape.html


Can

  % grep '^include' Makefile -c 
  159
includes with

  % wc --lines --total=only $(awk '/^include/{ print $2 }' Makefile) Makefile 
  22547
lines in total really count as having a single makefile? I have no dog in this fight, just wondering.


> See, for instance, the deals Mozilla has with their default DoH providers.

Like the one they had that just circled back around to the ISPs that regularly data-mine their users' traffic?: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/06/comcast-mozilla-...


They released a blog post about it with a little more info: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/privacy-preserving-attri...


Thanks.

So it looks like Interoperable Private Attribution is mostly Meta people; there's one guy from Mozilla, Eric Rescorla. Eric is not notable for adtech achievements; he's notable for his contributions to internet privacy, and security and cryptography.

[Edit] More detail: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KpdSKD8-Rn0bWPTu4UtK54ks...

Apparently the proposal is to store the match key in browser local storage; which means that you can block it by setting local storage to zero, or by regularly cleaning-out local storage.

That article doesn't mention once the privileges that should be granted to the user. It does mention the powers of the user agent, but that really means the browser manufacturer.


I don't understand how this can work. What is to prevent combining the new ostensibly privacy-preserving attribution with existing tracking technology for enhanced identity tracking?


For anyone wanting further information about this: https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/13p889x/red...


That line seems to often be said in threads where people are fighting against Microsoft's latest barrage of dark patterns. For some reason the time spent on dealing with that is never compared fairly: "Windows is only usable if your time has no value".


Even when that line was true, I could get Linux working with a few hours of effort

No amount of effort is going to make windows usable when there’s a company actively working to make it user-hostile


He did pick Cuba! If I recall correctly he was flying from Hong Kong to Cuba and the US canceled his passport on the layover in Russia, stranding him there.


If you're using uBlock Origin already, then you don't really need uMatrix or NoScript. Just enable medium mode or hard mode:

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-medium...

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-hard-m...


Medium and hard mode are nowhere near as flexible as as uMatrix. It's good, but it's not uMatrix.


I’m willing to put up with if it it means gorhill will have the energy to maintain just uBO instead of burning out entirely :)


Definitely! I'm going to keep using uMatrix until it starts getting in my way, but otherwise uBO will do.


Could you elaborate as to what the specific differences are?


For starters with uBO you can individually block types of requests (images, js, css, cookies, frames, "other") per domain and/or per subhuman.


*uMatrix, not uBO


And subdomain not subhuman :)


Sadly it seems that prior restrictions in Android have already taken their toll on Termux: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23224669


Yeah.

So much the worse for Android.


Why not just use ublock origin in medium mode[0] (or hard mode[1] if you're so inclined)?

[0]https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-medium...

[1]https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-hard-m...


I find it easier to understand what application wants looking at numbers. And to toggle on 1st party cookies. My setup in between hard mode and nightmare:

    * * * block
    * * frame block
    * 1st-party css allow
    * 1st-party frame allow
    * 1st-party image allow


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: