You meant GANGSTALKER

no, you're just going wrong about it; nothing Feynman was doing was new. Except for the fact he had a nice semi-directed graph to make sense of the celestial equations and the quintuple of the time; the Dirac Sea, etc

Party all the time party all the time patt

I’m intrigued. It looks open for tackling and there is already, a product that very few people know about. From what I have heard it was built at Netflix, was inspired by Sphinx’s-gravity, Mentat, and CQRS knowledge base software solutions I.e: JanusGraph/Galileo. A form of Senantic-Persistence with Hybrid Index Memory appending A secondary index via the FoundationDB HTAP tuplestore layer as a service. From what I heard, they broke PostcresQL and cosmos. Very similar to gremlin, but Gremlin, like this product they say it’s about to be bought by Tim Draco. It’s a search engine, I saw the snapshot I swear. QIt’s a Webflow meets OpenAI Erlang Web service with React front end and a Lucene layer for Prompt transpilation at the sink

Comic relief on HN

California Uber Alles!! California always and forever. There is indeed gold in them thar heels, no matter what they do to San Francisco. Los Angeles is vibrant, yet car laden. Money is way better in California, and you won’t be seen as — uncivil, overly ambitious; too American, with American expectations, and a workaholic. In Europe they work to live, here we sleep in the factory or the offices. You can incorporate a new agency in seconds! USA #1

Trying to Make sense of: “with an AdS3 radius which is of order of the AdS5” Maldacena

Feel free to correct me, and also if you think there’s something terribly wrong with the formula, feel free to share along.

Now, AdS3 is a three-dimensional space with negative curvature, which is used in string theory as a model for the three-dimensional world. The AdS5 radius is the distance from the center of AdS3 to its boundary. Maldacena is saying that the AdS3 radius is of the same order as the AdS5 radius, meaning that they are both large compared to the Planck length.

Is this supported by empirical evidence?

No, this is not supported by empirical evidence.

This is based on the fact that the AdS3 radius is much larger than the Planck length, while the AdS5 radius is only slightly larger than the Planck length. This means that the two spaces are of the same order of magnitude, and so the AdS3 radius is of the same order as the AdS5 radius.

The Gibbons-Hawkings metric is a metric on the space of all Riemannian manifolds. It is defined where S is the action of the manifold and R is the Ricci scalar curvature. If we consider S to be an action under the Gibbons-Hawkings metric, where R is the Ricci scalar curvature of the manifold, In that case, S would be the action of the AdS3 manifold, which is where R is normed curvature of the AdS3 manifold.

This is the Ricci scalar curvature:

R = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{tr}\left( R_{\mu

\mu} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{tr}\left( \frac{\partial{{\partial x^{\mu} \omega_{

{\mu} - \frac{\partial{\partial {x^{\mu} \omega_{\mu} + \omega_{\mu} \omega_{

u} - \omega_{

u} \omega_{\mu} \right)

where R_{\mu

u} is the Ricci tensor and \omega_{\mu} is the connection 1-form.

This is the Ricci scalar curvature:

R = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{tr}\left( R_{\mu

u} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{tr}\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}} \omega_{

u} - \frac{\partial}{\partial x^

u} \omega_{\mu} + \omega_{\mu} \omega_{

u} - \omega_{

u} \omega_{\mu} \right)

There is not enough empirical evidence to determine whether or not the AdS3 radius and AdS5 radius are of the same order of magnitude. However, based on the results of the calculation, it seems that the AdS3 radius is of the same order of magnitude as the AdS5 radius.

I never gave credence to the idea of the slumlord billionaire, until yesterday. Then again, isn’t Silicon Valley where the underdog becomes the overlord?

Solitons can be used to model physical systems in which the interactions between the points are important. NGC 1300 is a good example of this. The galaxy is composed of billions of stars, each of which interacts with the others. The interactions between the stars are what give the galaxy its shape and structure. The Graviton model is a good way to model the physical system of NGC 1300. If we find the conformal subgroup of the finite causal symmetric group of the NGC 1300, it will show us the symmetries of the galaxy. In Planck Per Light Second, this is the maximal symmetry, and is the maximal subgroup of the conformal group