So much (internships and full-time interviews) that I'd be embarrassed to share it online or quantify it. But each experience makes me better at interviewing.
> This non-absolute, generic universality must guard against the facile tendency of conflation with bloated, unmarked particulars -- namely Eurocentric universalism -- whereby the male is mistaken for the sexless, the white for raceless, the cis for the real, and so on. Absent such a universal, the abolition of class will remain a bourgeois fantasy, the abolition of race will remain a tacit white-supremacism, and the abolition of gender will remain a thinly veiled misogyny.
In fact it's not hypocritical at all. Not even the least.
The parent isn't denying the mistakes or terrible things the West has done in the past.
Allow me to give you an example of why this isn't hypocritical in concept.
If I'm an obese person, it is not hypocritical to lambast other obese people for the health consequences of their physical condition - so long as I'm not denying the application of those same health consequences to my own obesity situation.
The parent comment would be hypocritical if it pretended / claimed there is no racism in Western culture, while pointing out Chinese racism or beliefs about racial superiority. (assuming the parent is part of Western culture of course)
