Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Grieverheart's commentslogin

Isn’t 3 frames of latency already way too much? I would say they are both too slow!


Perhaps for understanding the structure itself, but having the structure available allows us to focus on a coarser level. We also don't want to use quantum mechanics to understand the everyday world, and that's why we have classic mechanics etc.


Also similar to temporal antialiasing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_anti-aliasing .


I don’t completely agree with Rossman here. You are buying the streaming right and not the file. What I agree on though is that they don’t make that clear to their customers.


They use terminology such as "purchase" to intentionally lead you to believe that it is a purchase and not renting. Also when they do make it more obvious that it is a license they make you think it is a perpetual license rather than temporary.


This is similar to buying a DVD. You don't buy the right to the video playing on your TV; only the right to play it on your TV from this exact physical disc. If the disc breaks, you have to buy it again.


This has, AFAIK, been ruled not to be the case. You have the right to back up DVDs you legally bought for precisely this reason.


Well, that might depend on where you live. But point being that if your backups also break, you don't have the right to watch the thing any more.


It is possible for your disk and backups to break, or to be stolen, etc. But it’s just an unfortunate thing that can happen to anything you own. It’s different from the corporation taking away the rights of millions of people just because a licence ran out.


That is different. I was making the point that with physical media you don't have an unlimited right to watch forever either.


So am I fine if I stream it from a pirate site rather than downloading it?


Ok fine, I bought the streaming rights. Why do they get to take them away from me randomly and arbitrarily?


> are buying the streaming right and not the file. What I agree on though is that they don’t make that clear to their customers.

No. It’s not a matter of not being clear enough.

If it’s not clear enough, maybe 10-20% of customers would be confused.

I’d bet anything that if we did a survey 80+ percent of users would think that the platform wouldn’t be able to unilaterally revoke their content.

It goes beyond “not clear” and straight into fraud and false advertising.


This. I used to be a multi monitor type of person but when desktop switching became good (I first experienced this in Linux) I started using a single larger monitor and never looked back.


I hadn’t come across the this before, but in Dutch we have the oer- which is spelled out as in poor, so I somehow connected the dots.


I once trained myself to recognise if I was dreaming by looking at something in my dream, looking away and looking back again. If the thing I was looking at had changed in any way, I was dreaming. This allowed me to partly shape my dreams, so I can’t totally buy the conjecture that senses are what’s taking the dream machine. Another thing supporting this is the fact that I could let my body fall asleep while keeping my consciousness awake. Even though the senses are technically shut off (sleep paralysis), I was not dreaming. I think the fact that dreaming is similar to generative models has more to do with how we learn shapes, and that is by learning sub shapes and categories of shapes. My theory is that that’s also how long term memory works. Instead of storing the full senses senses at that moment, parts of those senses are replaced by concepts/sub shapes.


Nothing beats Safari in terms of battery usage, and there are features like the reading list that work really well (for me). For development, yes, I always have Chrome installed in case I needed it.


I don't think this is still the case with Chrome 110 and higher that sleeps/suspends inactive tabs.


This is also the reason many companies rewrite code to new framework because they cannot find developers that know how to program in the old framework. Really narrow-minded if you ask me. You just need a good programmer than can easily learn new languages/frameworks. It might take a good programmer a week to learn a new language/framework.


An old job of mine put new employees through two months of bootcamp. The first month was mostly learning the industry idiosyncrasies and the second was role-specific training on the tech stack.

Understandably, this only works at large and established corporations who have enough spare revenue to invest in a dedicated training team.


I got my current job because I was able to learn a new framework overnight


Naturally I came across Jerobeam's work while conceiving the visuals of my game. You can read more about the process in my blog post http://nicktasios.nl/posts/in-search-for-creativity.html


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: