Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | HelloUsername's commentslogin

Discussed last year when it was announced https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44226978

> Many West Coasters can't tell the difference between Virginia and West Virginia.

The country roads?


Now do MW (2007) and MW2 (2009) :)

> With https://llama.app, you just don't know. So GitHub is probably the best source to link

You can always check here on HN as well to get a sense of its authenticity: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49267928


No, no. Instead of taking the time to unpack the boxes, it's better to spend time to play with AI, and leave the boxes unpacked forever.


[flagged]


Have you looked at it? This is not AI slop. There are videos of the author (his hands at least), where he folds the paper airplanes as a demonstration. They even include an outdoors shot of the airplane in action.

Calling everything we don't like "AI slop" is what has to stop. Foldable Flight has a YouTube channel with hundreds of thousands of subs and content going back years.

Thanks! https://foldnfly.com is so much better than the spammy nonsense linked in tfa.

That site completely blocks you if you use an Adblock though.

For me it is just the opposite: foldnfly shows, while I see no content on foldablefly

Hi! I'm Kyle — the creator behind FoldableFlight.com. I don't run any ads on my website. Are you saying you can't see content on FoldableFlight.com while running an ad blocker?

I am using cromite and ironfox on android and I cannot see much except for the shopping link for the different planes: https://imgur.com/a/omEPIyx

They both have adblockers enabled: no clue if that is the root cause though.


Looked pretty good until the anti-ad-blocker message blocked the entire content of the site.

Doesn't happen with ublock origin.


Related: "Alleged Chinese spy had 'close relationship' with Nvidia boss Jensen Huang" 29.oct.2026 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50293047 248 comments

I do like how the people who expressed skepticism at the media then aren't talking now in this thread.

The top comment is attempting to trivialize the news...

There are a lot of people on here that have made a lot of money because of Jensen.

HN has a natural bias towards protecting the semiconductor president.


...because HN's title is editorialized, and exacerbates the linked statement.

It’s really not for anyone with a modicum of experience and knowledge around corporate boards.

It is editorialized, and doesn't match the title or contents of the statement.

HN has a rule about titles to avoid derailed threads like this.


Eh, the original title is meaningless. “A Statement” isn’t a title. It’s common for functionally untitled works to get a title here.

All of which distracts from the misinformation that Huang is not being investigated by his Board.


It's not wrong that Jensen is being investigated, it's just not the scope of the stated investigation.

HN's title, as the top comment alleges, is extremely misleading as to what the board's goals are.


It's on point and honest for what the Board is actually doing. A lot of people seem upset by that, which I guess tracks–it's been a popular meme stock. And everyone's e.g. an aircraft investigator on here when tragedy strikes.

I personally hold no stock in Nvidia, nor do I consider Jensen beyond reproach. The title is blatantly misleading.

The top comment is correct to question the title, as it leads to more interesting HN comments than the driveby CEO pugilism that many bottom-barrel commentators participate in. Your response to the top comment is condescending and speculative instead of curious or informative. It seems to me like people are fulminating on both sides, and clearly Nvidia's board doesn't know the whole story either.


To be clear, I never accused you of shilling. But when a large group chooses to be ignorant of what a headlining corporate-governance action means, and starts pretending the Board isn't doing what the Board is obviously doing, it does make one curious for what the finance influencers are up to now.

It’s not speculative to say a Board launching this sort of investigation is investigating its CEO. It’s borderline absurd to suggest otherwise, given the law and precedent of such announcements. I admit I was condescending, but not intentionally—folks who don’t have any domain expertise really want this to be something it’s not.


Spotify?

kagi.com is also immediately the homepage. Does Kagi have a HTML only / no JS version, for search only?

If you disable js in your browser and kagi works just fine

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: