> OpenStreetMap is open data, licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) by the OpenStreetMap Foundation (OSMF). In summary:

>

> You are free to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt our data, as long as you credit OpenStreetMap and its contributors. If you alter or build upon our data, you may distribute the result only under the same license.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

There is quite a bit of evidence for edits made to OSM appearing on Google Maps shortly after.

I've personally noticed this for edits I've made to obscure, completely out of the way areas.

> I always assumed that anything unencrypted is scanned one way or another

By this logic, I should be happy if mail delivered to my address always arrives already open.

Staff is exempted from mass surveillance.

To think that we almost decided on a common army in 1959… EU integration has slowed down massively since then.

Some of us deliberately decide to not consume American blockbuster media.

If they really wanted to honour Kurt Vonnegut, Anthropic wouldn't exist.

I'm not sure what you mean by that

Read cat's cradle to understand the comment

Surely "Player Piano" is more relevant?

Also a great rec

[yɡˌdrasilː]

You are feigning ignorance.

I used to care about copyright, before AI came and I realised that it somehow does not apply to big corporations mass stealing. If Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft do not care about copyright, why should I?

It's happening https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2026/01/15/wikipedia-ce... Although editors paid directly by the Foundation are not the majority of Wikipedia.