Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Josteniok's commentslogin

And radar reboots in flight for F-35 seem to be nothing new: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/f-35-...


I really never liked the Boeing X-32 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-32). That big square intake and tiny wings just looks ridiculous.


I use Firefox with uBlock Origin on the Mac and it works great, but for Safari the best option I've found is AdGuard (https://adguard.com). However, it is nowhere near as effective as uBlock Origin since Safari did the Manifest V3 thing.


> since Safari did the Manifest V3 thing.

More accurately, Safari removed support for webRequest BlockingResponse in 2019. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web...

This was unrelated to Manifest V3, and in fact Safari has not deprecated Manifest V2. Manifest V3 does remove support for webRequest BlockingResponse in Chrome, but I believe not in Firefox.


I don't think he is super great at dialog, either, but I like how his cursing is world-specific rather than just reusing what we think of as cursing in our world. He has quite a bit of it in Stormlight Archives (see: https://www.17thshard.com/forum/topic/7204-swearing-in-rosha...) but it doesn't "offend" us here in our world because it is specific to their world.


That's kind of a high fantasy trope. "Blood and ashes!" from Wheel of Time comes to mind. It's like how they like to use different measures of time and distance. "It took him a fortnight to travel all those leagues." Helps take you out of the real world.


> "Blood and ashes!" from Wheel of Time comes to mind

Probably fair to note that Sanderson wrote a bunch of those books to finish up the series after the author died and at his estates request?


Blood and ashes was a Robert Jordan thing, blasted Sanderson had nothing to do with it.


I meant it more in the way that he did it first and Sanderson ended up finishing his magnum opus? Basically two birds in a tree.


It's the ultimate giveaway in the cosmere when someone curses with a different word than used locally, is the sure sign they are far more powerful than they seem.


I was an early adopter of Kagi but I cancelled the moment they started messing with the plans. I know I'd have the early adopter flag but I just felt betrayed by the messaging and I also don't want to use a search engine where I'm trying to think about how many searches I'm making and if I'm going over a certain number. The updates in the article look pretty good but I can't get past those two issues.


I know people that do this very thing but none of them admit to themselves that they "know that doing X will harm the company in the long term". Instead they create a narrative that says "This time it will be different" so they don't have to be bothered by any kind of pesky conscience. I don't even know if they do this consciously, it just seems to happen.


The article is from May 2019. Chenoweth has a paper published in April 2020 (see: https://carrcenter.hks.harvard.edu/files/cchr/files/CCDP_005...) where she hedges on the 3.5% rule. For example, one of her "key takeaways" at the top of the paper is:

New research suggests that one nonviolent movement, Bahrain in 2011-2014, appears to have decisively failed despite achieving over 6% popular participation at its peak. This suggests that there has been at least one exception to the 3.5% rule, and that the rule is a tendency, rather than a law.


I work for a really large organization that has received praise for what it is doing with zero trust but to us lowly users the implementation has really meant the total death of single sign on. We sign on constantly to everything now all the time.


I wondered about this too and I like your advice about salt but apparently Apple is suing Rivos about this very thing: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/apple-lawsuit-says-...


The article says 40 employees not hundreds, but I imagine that 40 of Apple's top chip talent is going to hurt, that is a lot of brain power to lose!

Seems some employees took more than themselves to Rivos. "at least two former Apple engineers took gigabytes of confidential information with them to Rivos."


Remember Apple cancelling their contract with Imagination (GPU) and hiring their employees to work on Apple's GPU?


Hurts donut.


I wonder if tha’ts subject to criminal prosecution or merely civil remedies.


I never said or implied that they didn't take many, just not hundreds. In the tens? I believe that. Up to a hundred? That's a tall order. Multiple hundreds? That's catastrophic to any org, including one as large as Apple


[My colleague] would appear to see time spent in planning and writing documents as essentially wasted time, since he asserts that without process we are faster. We are not faster in reality. We are merely faster to say we're finished. That is not the same thing as actually being finished: we can all think of examples of that. And the uncertainty induced by the unknown magnitude of correction required is, IMHO, the biggest contribution to our inefficiency and ineffectiveness.

I've spent my entire career working for a medium sized organization and in the past few years it has tried to become "agile". Most of this push is predicated on the idea that we will be able to go faster this way. As a result we have deconstructed ourselves. What's weird is that now we aren't actually even "faster to say we are finished." No, now we are only faster to say that we are going to be faster to be finished. We still end up taking a long time but as long as the slide deck says we are going to be done in a short amount of time, then all is believed to be running smoothly. It's very strange/depressing/unsettling.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: