> You can easily create a reality in which you reside there for majority of time.
Cautios when dealing with German tax officers: They are checking the 183-day-limit very very strictly, includin invoices/bank statements if required, hotel bookings etc. They even apply intelligence colleagues if in doubt for big fishes.
183-days rule is NOT a thing in germany for corporate taxes, and I think it is not in income taxes either. It may be an indicator, but it is not a hard proof. Important is, where you have your social life set up ("Lebensmittelpunkt"). That is, you can reside more than 183 days abroad, but if you have a family, golf club membership, permanent residence, your stock brokerage account etc. still in germany, you still count as a german tax resident. There are no hard laws with X days around it, german law revolves a lot around that "Lebensmittelpunkt" which will be decided on a per-case basis.
It is about where the actual "effective management" is considered to be located: If you live in Germany permanently, the tax office can decided to tax you as if you were a Germany company - and yes, most of the times they do it.
If you travel regularly and have an office in Estonia and you make the effective management decisions there, you are obliged to Estonian tax system only.
But at the end of the article, Google suggests that businesses should be more like these students.
So is google, by this article, suggesting businesses to not pay for AI
> Because your competitors will do so and they will be one step ahead :-)
Then couldn't the same question have been applied during students as well. we are bounded by peer pressure as well and I wonder if something similar will be felt within schooling, atleast that's my feeling of how things progress but the article contradicts that but also in a way, contradicts the trillion dollar spending of AI.
I hope that there becomes a resurgence of not show-offing AI use, but rather use it for prototypes, fine (as the students did) but have the final output be Human generated for the most part. I do agree with students that this is how it should be used but reality says that its being used to churn out AI Slop at quite high rates.
I would just call them "enterprise integrators" or "system integrators", according to my understanding this is what the palantir guys are doing: Customizing the integration at the edge, since its a complex task they call them "FDE"?
We actually don't want them to do exactly what the Palantir FDEs do. They will be customer-facing, but we're looking for people with a high degree of coding skill. We're getting lots of people to apply who have the customer-facing experience but barely any experience with coding.
Even IF tomorrow would come a fresh "and super nice US president", Trump et al crushed so much that the damage is already severe and will be permanent for the future: US gov lost so much trust in more or less everything that was perceived as somehow reliable by others.
The damage is that big that -apart from BigTech- the US-industry will have a hard time coming
There was a report lately that smartphones brought to young natives in rural areas of Amazon/etc., completely stopped learning the skills that helped the tribes to survive (hunting etc.)
Cautios when dealing with German tax officers: They are checking the 183-day-limit very very strictly, includin invoices/bank statements if required, hotel bookings etc. They even apply intelligence colleagues if in doubt for big fishes.
reply