Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more Lalabadie's commentslogin

That got me curious. My Github username is three characters but includes a hyphen.

Turns out it's a valid single-character name as well on GH:

https://github.com/-


I suspect a lot of the comfort preferences come from there.

The average monitor has a brightness level equivalent to screaming in a study room, and a color calibration that assumes fluorescent office lighting.


The first feature paragraph on the Photopea landing page:

> There are no uploads. Photopea runs on your device, using your CPU and your GPU. All files open instantly, and never leave your device.


I'm pretty sure the point is that anything clearly generated will result in an instant ban. That seems rather fair, you want contributors who only submit code they can fully understand and reason about.


The language clearly says "If you use an LLM [...] to make any kind of contribution".


[I was wrong and posted a link to an earlier policy/discussion overridden by the OP]


The part you are quoting is being removed. The policy used to state "If you contribute un-reviewed LLM generated...", now simply states "If you use an LLM to make any kind of contribution then you will immediately be banned without recourse."


you seem to be reading that backwards, that's the content that was removed. it now just says "if LLM, banned": https://github.com/twpayne/chezmoi/blob/master/.github/CODE_...


I'm a designer with enough front-end knowledge to lead front-end dev when needed.

To someone like me, especially on solo projects, using infra that effectively isolates me from the concerns (and risks) of lower-level devops absolutely makes sense. But I welcome the choice because of my level of competence.

The trap is scaling an org by using that same shortcut until you're bound to it by built-up complexity or a persistent lack of skill/concern in the team. Then you're never really equipped to reevaluate the decision.


My issue with the article's repeated use of a Title + List of Things structure isn't that it's LLM output, it's that it's LLM output directly, with no common sense editing done afterwards to restore some intelligent rhythm to the writing.


And they don't spend money, they take debt against their existing assets to fund projects and investments. So long as they can service the loans across economic downturns, they don't particularly have to feel the effects of a recession, outside of the mentioned opportunities to buy the market at a discount.


The issue with a model like this (fixed small percentage) is that your biggest clients are the most incentivized to move away.

At scale, OpenRouter will instead get you the lower high-volume fees they themselves get from their different providers.


He doesn't have to sell. He can finance the deal with debt backed by his newly risen stock as collateral. Then the debt is used to further inflate the price of the stock.

The flywheel metaphor is pretty apt.


I'm a senior designer who often contributes to front-end code when it's convenient for my client.

Fixing and updating the README when I join a new team and set up their dev environment is always extremely well-received.


If i'm gonna untangle something, i may as-well write some notes. If i'm writing notes on it already, i may as-well refine the grammar a bit and update the docs. It's really quite small effort compared to the main work of learning the system, so i don't quite get why so few people do it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: