Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Master_Odin's commentslogin

Given how good Proton is, I don't think it's useful to target Linux for most indie devs unless it's a one click build for multiple platforms. Even then, I've definitely had more issues with games with native Linux builds than Proton, where there's been a number of games I've set to use Proton over native to get better performance.


Until Microsoft decides it is enough.


The OP directly says:

> that the Bun Claude bot created a PR for about 3 weeks ago

The PR with bad code that's also been ignored was made by the bot that Bun made, and brags about in their acquisition post.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize provides a good overview of why he got the award and the surrounding controversy.


- Promotion of nuclear nonproliferation.

- Reaching out to the Muslim world.

I see. Thank you.


I'm a strong believer that PRs should be merged via a "squash and merge" strategy, with the singular commit being descriptive of the overall change and having a link back to the PR for deeper story analysis as needed. I'm also a staunch believer at this point that PRs should really focus on one thing as well. If when working on a bug you discover another semi-related bug? Open two PRs.

Let main be the story of how code got from point A to B, and PRs be the story of how each incremental step was made.


PRs only live on GitHub, what happens if it gets shut down or it accidentally loses some data?


the entire repo lives only on github as well, there is no meaningful difference between git commits and PR comments in a github-hosted repo


Uhm you might want to look up git clone




In terms of changing loot box contents, that has been going on for at least the past like 7+ years through "randomizers", though I think mostly used by speed runners.


The Republican plan for the federal government for decades has been to try to kneecap various agencies and departments so fully that they can't function well, go "look how poorly they operate! Time to close it down and let private sector handle it!"


That wouldn't be the goal though, just the means to their end. The goal would have to be shrinking the government, for example, or to move authority out to the private sector.

The entire party is psychos wanting to kneecap departments just to watch them bleed.


It's called Starve The Beast


Lots of interesting reading linked from the wiki page:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast


I think that they've been fine with it so long as the stock price has continued to climb. If it starts to meaningfully fall, I'd except sentiment to more meaningfully change on him running multiple businesses/DOGE.


I'm happy to buy games, but once there's literally no legal way to get a game (or movie or show), then piracy is the only solution to keep that piece of media alive.


Sure, I've bought more than my share of movies, games, books, TV series, but at this point I've kind of drawn a line in the sand of "I will only buy physical media" or "I will only buy it if I can get a DRM-free copy" (e.g. GOG.com). I don't like the idea of my media disappearing the second it becomes inconvenient for the entertainment company.

Sadly, it feels like Blu-rays are becoming a rare thing, particularly in the US. I wanted to buy legit copies of Infinity Train and Close Enough before they were taken off HBO Max, but as far as I'm aware there's no legitimate way to purchase Close Enough. At least Infinity Train can be bought off Amazon streaming still I guess.

It feels like these companies want it both ways. They want total control of the media landscape, while simultaneously taking away the media that we actually like, presumably for tax writeoffs.


While I agree tooling could be better, while in grad school I found that a lot of academics / grad students don't know that any of the tooling even exists and never bothered to learn if and such tooling existed that could improve their life. Ditto with updating their language runtimes. It really seemed like they viewed code as a necessary evil they had to do to achieve their research goal.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: