I think it's this: https://github.com/zardoy/minecraft-renderer

Thank you!

Reveal.js with the multiplex plugin [0] does that. I write my presentation in Quarto [1] and render them to reveal.

0: https://revealjs.com/multiplex/

1: https://quarto.org/docs/presentations/revealjs/

Facebook actively courted publishers so they'd post links to their content on their pages. Now they want to charge them for the privilege.

First hit’s free.

Also, there's a missing space in "Look insideeach cabin" and "Save astay plan".

It's not very good semantically either.

> Give me a recipe for soup.

> Here is a recipe for soup:

> Saffa-Cake-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-Sweet-

I get why you would want that, but I don't get why you don't get that it might not be the case for others. I love searching and clicking and reading around. Sometimes I read fascinating things about topics I wasn't searching for. I can't imagine a world where all my web searching is done through an annoying chatbot.

Corporations can host whatever they want and governments can ban them for it.

And can also criminally prosecute the individuals responsible for those decisions if the law says so.

Scrollable story, sometimes also referred to as a scrolly. This is a particularly bad example though.

Most of the cost comes from paying the drivers, but also cost is a proxy for emmissions?

Yes? Why is this strange?

Drivers emit a lot of CO2, just like every person in the US. A driverless car allows these emissions to be reallocated to other more productive areas.

People take their salaries and buy food, clothes, heating and air conditioning, cars and fuel, and plane tickets, and furniture. All of those things generate emissions in their production and/or transportation. This is why dollars is such a good proxy for co2 emissions.

Surely a person driving 18 people will emit less than each person driving themselves? I can see how dollars can be a proxy for macroeconomic stuff, for example by comparing countries, but it doesn't make much sense for comparing individual units of transport.

I don't understand why we have to do napkin maths to guess what's more polluting. There is countless research showing buses emit less than individual cars per passenger per km, self-driving or not.

And there's no reason buses can't be self-driving as well, if anything, them driving slower, on dedicated lanes and on fixed routes would make it much easier.

> Surely a person driving 18 people will emit less than each person driving themselves?

No. A person driving themselves does not create any _incremental_ CO2 emissions. They don't need a dedicated full-time position to do the driving.

> There is countless research showing buses emit less than individual cars per passenger per km, self-driving or not.

Care to share it? I actually read through most of highly cited articles in this area, and it's not at all so clear-cut. For example: https://ourworldindata.org/travel-carbon-footprint

The very source you are providing is pretty clear to me. For cars, only hybrids and EVs are more efficient, and that is because it's comparing electric passenger cars with all buses (most of which still run on fossil fuels). There is no data for electric buses, but it's pretty intuitive to me that they would emit less per passenger kilometre than an electric car.

If there was a ghostwriting detector, I would use that too.