Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | RobRivera's commentslogin

If that is your way of communicating criticism, you will be low in the sea of comments that I would have addressed in good faith.

I would advise you to re-read it. It is a surprisingly apt counter.

I think it's a decent point. It's a very low hanging criticism of the point being made, but to my knowledge it hasn't been countered very well yet?

smokes cigarette

Life, eh?


You should take this up with someone in the org you trust

Prickly

>open the door

>get on the floor

>walk the dinosaur


Can someone give me the tl:dr, I lost track after the title /s

(Adhd joke hehe/no hehe)


Llllllllllllol?

They replaced the old space jam website with a boring href to a yt of the trailer :(

https://www.spacejam.com/


It’s still there if you close that out: https://www.spacejam.com/1996/

I cant believe they've done this. They didnt even use iframes.

It should be trivial to reauthor .swf content to modern web standards.

https://github.com/sv1sjp/flash-swf-to-html5-toolkit


Macromedia Flash 1.0 was released the same year as the Space Jam website, I don't think it used .SWFs. In fact I don't remember .SWFs being common until 2002-2003 (but that's my biased viewpoint, since that's when I discovered Newgrounds.)

I get a secure connection failure. Maybe it's for the best

[Scoff, Scoff]

He is not guilt of using AI to create songs.

He is guilty of creating a bot farm to stream his music, to increase his user count to earn royalties, which is fraud.


He is still defrauding the streaming platform. It is like creating a userbase just to get investments in your company.

If that "created" userbase give you the similar profit of "real" userbase, i dont see what's wrong.

It wasn’t giving Spotify similar profit, though. Their subscription pricing assumes both a) ads and b) that on average listeners won’t listen more than a certain amount, and will listen relatively broadly such that a single artist isn’t disproportionately rewarded (and thus lots of different artists find it lucrative to be on the platform, increasing its appeal).

In short, this isn’t a “cool infinite money hack” whereby you can pay a subscription fee and make it back with dividends as an artist. Instead, it’s https://xkcd.com/1494/


You need help understanding why spotify paying a man for fake users isn't being defrauded?

Didn't reddit famously do this.

If he created a startup to do the exactly same thing, he would be a millionaire.

Matter of factly, if he did create a bot farm for hire, and NOT get paid for streaming, but paid just to scale the bots FOR other people, yes lol

That startup exists already it is an A16Z thing.

Or like streaming artists music to users while not paying the artists.

So just like when Tinder etc create fake profiles to lure paying str8 males in?

We have a "it's okay if the job creatoooors do it" problem in society atm imo.


A stretch IMO. They were are all real paid users, just “agentic” bot users.

They can't be both real AND bots. Get a clue.

Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: