That's always been the enterprise tech way. Using the product that comes with the platform the company is already signed up to pay for is easier than requesting a payment to a brand new service.
They don't need to be the best, they just need to not force a customer to go elsewhere.
Are people finding a real need for importing and updating git actions? Aren't they usually just running a one line bash command? I'd just copy paste the action in to your config so it's fully locked and under your control rather than importing some opaque script from a no name github user.
A lot of things that should be one bash command turn out to be dozens of lines of incantations and handling edge cases. Microsoft I'm looking in your direction.
It mostly replaced paying with cash for people to people transactions and removed the massive delay doing online payments to people. It didn't change payments to businesses.
Not many products are held to the same standard as software. An equivalent would be something like recalling a car model because the breaks stop working when an attacker cuts the brake line.
Open a bug report on Eye of Gnome. WebP has no issues opening on all of the native MacOS tooling. Since this is an open source program it should be fairly easy to submit a PR to bring in webP support.
There's going to be massive trials over the next few years. So many people are going to have accountability catch back up to them. Maybe not the ultra rich but all these ICE goons shooting people on the street will be held accountable.
The deleted articles aren't actually removed from the storage, they just get delisted. Articles get removed because there isn't enough reputable sources to create an article.
Wikipedia would rather you create a blog post or any other method of getting information on the internet than to host unverifiable information under their trusted brand name.
This. I had one deleted because it needed more editing and I didn't get back to it in time, but you can just edit it and request it be put back, IIRC. It's like one button click.
The slight increase in fine detail is just not worth the toxicity imo. Put a 0.2mm nozzle on your FDM printer and you'll get good enough quality. Leave resin to businesses that can set up a proper warehouse with fume extraction and PPE.
You can even prototype your designs at home with FDM and send the final file to a company to do the resin prints.
I agree that for most people it's not worth it, but for people who need it it's absolutely necessary. The biggest hurdle is making sure new hobbyists don't just assume it's like FDM with minimal post-processing.
They don't need to be the best, they just need to not force a customer to go elsewhere.
reply