Excuse my ignorance, but how is that migration (especially of older libraries that are apparently being rewritten) not just a copy/paste action from one server to the other? When I build software to deploy it it includes everything it requires library wise. At least the few things I've deployed so far.
You have to copy data across, and confirm that everything worked correctly, and if you're being fancy about it you need to freeze writes to the old server while you are migrating and then unfreeze after you've directed traffic to the new server. It's not trivial.
Sometimes you need library version X, which uses a compiled binary for the platform, which requires C library version Y, which requires glibc version Z, which is deprecated on the current version of the OS, etc etc etc.
Or you can update the app to remove the dependency on the library.
But honestly, this is what containers or VMs are built for in the first place.
I've been on Rinvoq since last summer and I delayed getting on it for that very reason. Reading the risks was really not making me feel well, after I've already taken multiple other medications. The worst part is, that it doesn't work as perfectly as some previous meds have. But at least I can enjoy eating out occasionally again without much worry and can travel again. That quality of life improvement puts it into a slightly better perspective again.
That still wouldn't justify being asked a hundred times. But I also cannot relate. I use Firefox as my main browser and start Chrome and Edge semi-regularly. Only Edge keeps asking me to make it my default browser. And then of course there were the few times where a Windows update "accidentally" set Edge as my default browser.
The second checkbox in Firefox's Settings panel is "Always check if Firefox is your default browser" and I have every reason to believe that Firefox respects that setting. Do the other browsers not have a similar setting? I don't have Chrome so cannot check but Edge doesn't seem to have this at the top of their settings and perhaps nowhere in their settings. Consider a browser that's not so hostile :D
I use Firefox as my default browser and only open the other two occasionally. Just last night I opened Chrome and Edge, and once again gave me a big dialog about applying suggested settings. The only setting was to set it as my default browser. And the options were "ok" and "later".
I have one pretty much yearly. You have to make sure not to eat the wrong things (like seeds, nuts) several days before and then the day before eat very light food and stop around noon. Then take the laxatives in the evening and again the next day about 4 hours ahead of your procedure.
The worst part to me in all of this is really drinking that cup of laxatives. The sedation (for me) has always been dosed well enough that I feel fine within 30-60 minutes after waking up. Although you can't operate a car or other machinery for the rest of the day. But I also don't have to work on those days, so it's a relaxing day to me.
I've switched to 90%, working a total of 36 hours, and spreading that to 9 hours per day. Not even much of a difference on work days, as I used to work more Monday through Thursday to have a shorter Friday. So it's basically 30 minutes more, and a day off. And only 10% less pay instead of 20%.
That has irked me for quite some time. I always manually select 1080p, because sometimes YT claims it's already playing 1080p, but it's obviously not and the video starts buffering anew when I select 1080p manually. Quite annoying
Roughly around the same time as the anti-adblocking effort, youtube started just not playing the video stream for me much of the time. I say play a video, it will start playing the audio, and the video will just be a frozen image.
In unrelated news, my youtube-dl usage is way, way up.
Get the "Enhancer for Youtube" extension, among many adjustments, it does this clicking for you.
I also had this issue, videos would frequently wobble down to like 240p or whatever, on a stable, high speed wired connection.
It's not an internet problem since I never have to buffer when using this forced setting, so it's probably YT trying to save a few bandwidth bucks when they think people aren't looking.
What is even worse about these doctors, is that sometimes they may be doctors, but not medical doctors.
I watched a video on YT once and the doctor's explanation for why his advice would work seemed a bit weird to me. Checking his credentials it turns out he's not a medical doctor and known for alternate science and questionable view points.
All the YT comments were really positive of course, giving any reader zero value or a chance for a different view.
reply