why not both?

how long are these videos? 2,973 of them (and not even the 20,000 count)? even at 15 minute clips that is like... five years?! watching non-stop.

I am hard pressed to believe that this was for the exec.

what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander

I just wnat to know what bandwidth this exec has at his house. I want it.

I doubt many consumers of these videos are watching them straight through like a normal movie.

Don't know how they're keeping up with the plot like that.

A few decades back, someone I know had entire CD towers worth of burned CDs & DVDs of porn. Easily onto the thousand discs.

This was mostly a hoarding thing. Hoarders gonna hoard.

Checkout r/DataHoarder for what kind of person does this.

It's about having the library, not about reading the books.

Hoarders gonna hoard

I've heard the same about pirated software, people who have downloaded thousands of programs. People are strange.

umm it’s called archiving, thank you very much.

3000 fifteen minute clips is 750 hours, or 31 days. A lot, but not five years.

It said it was AT&T, which probably implies AT&T Fiber. Gigabit fiber.

humans aren't watching it mate, they're training something related to VR

Yes, and no.

A US President definitely has the authority to restrict what is used on Government contracts. The Gov is the buyer so they can and do ask what they do and do not want used by the federal contractors.

Can a US President dictate for non-Gov contracts? Strong to weak to none. Strong around infrastructure providers (think power, water, electric, etc.) through the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA). This is where this EO falls, "banning certain foreign-manufactured equipment from the U.S. bulk-power system".

Conjecture, but i think this is targeting data centers...

It is all about those transformers.

Is there a method to opt out of this for non-EU people? I do not see such option in the article.

I have gone through Schiphol and strip searched because the buttons on my winter coat were suspicious.

This is not a US-only airport staff issue. I am on the road most of the last three decades and it is international. It is one, binding "quality" in every country. Most the airport staff's core competency rests elsewhere in almost all airports.

I am hedging because i have had nuggets of exceptional service and support here and there, even in nightmarish hellscapes like Heathrow. Flight attendants are a whole different area of joy and fears...

Where would Netgate pfSense+ fit on that list?

I tried Mikrotik and the UI was wasting so much of my time, it was worth switching to Netgate, for me.

or, not force people into mandatory digital ID wallets at all.