Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _kb's commentslogin


If you enjoy that, allow me to introduce you to the displeasure of WORST and Malbolge.

https://esolangs.org/wiki/WORST https://esolangs.org/wiki/Malbolge

They’re both a truly bottomless pit of malaise.


> Warning: running this program at certain minute values will cause the interpreter to swap stdout and stderr.


>The same program translated to normalized Malbolge for *clarity*

The audacity


That absurdity doesn’t need modern AI. All it takes is any statistical system that automates human interaction.

See Robodebt (Australia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robodebt_scheme), which lead a number of people to suicide, as an example.


Yep.

Manna, at MarshallBrain, is a fantastic read. https://web.archive.org/web/20260725174355/https://marshallb...


hunter2


Or more generally: it’s perhaps not the best idea to make the entirety of your reasoning ability dependant on something external to you. Doubly so if that’s a tool with a subscription model.


What a jerk.


The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a god is a good guy with a god.


The similar comparison I enjoy is “a golden retriever on LSD”.

If you apply the dogs on acid mental model it helps establish appropriate levels of trust.


It falls apart fast because no golden retriever is finding errors in my CMake file.


Then again, have you ever asked a golden retriever about CMake errors? Rubber ducking is a real thing, after all. Besides, a golden retriever would be a good morale boost if nothing else.


ML in general is alien to how we think of intelligence.

The closest I can make a biology analogy, is if someone had an immortal and congenitally-brain-damaged large rodent, and mapped tokens to different scent molecules, and spent 800,000 years training it on how well it could imagine the next smell in the sequence before even considering making it conversational.

Yes, it can do a lot.

But also, it took a long "subjective" (if it even has that) time to get there; and despite it being really bad at learning from examples, it is pretty surprising that such a small brain was even capable of learning so much at all, even though it had an effectively unbounded (by biological standards) amount of time spent on that training.


That’s more of a Labrador job


You just need to partake in some strong psychedelics with the dog first.


But have you asked the Steven Hawking of Golden Retrievers ? And then added LSD ?


You just have to trust the exponentials


For context: personally strongly in favour of legislation that will kneecap algorithmic feeds in almost any way.

A big concern with these (and other associated laws) being pushed through is it grants the eSafety Commissioner powers to edict what’s allowed.

That position is appointed, not elected.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: