Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | abc123abc123's commentslogin

Already done and in use in the nordics. Most likely in most dc:s in the northern hemisphere with cold winters.

Silence! Do not let fact and reason stop the woke or anti-AI agenda! Only emotions count in this space!

Woke != anti-ai. Separate ideas. I’m pro AI and would be considered woke, which I would not use pejoratively.

This is the way! One jurisdiction where I resided for a while loved these alerts. A rain cloud, warm weather, too cold, too warm, the phone was beeping at least 1 or 2 times a month. Fortunately my trusty chinese produced Nokia allowed me to turn all of it off to get some peace.

"Every memory begins with tiny changes inside the brain. A discovery that helped explain those changes has earned neuroscientist Oswald Steward one of science’s highest honors.

Steward received the 2026 Kavli Prize in Neuroscience, a USD 1 million award and one of science’s most prestigious awards, for research that transformed scientists’ understanding of how the brain learns and stores memories."

And that's what it took. One comment on hackernews and the prize was retracted. HN at its best! ;)



Well, it does seem that memories may be embedded in the nervous system as well as the brain, so I don’t think the OP is wrong. You sometimes hear of heart transplant patients having other people’s memories / preferences. So, it’s not good evidence, but it’s a possibility.

That's quite a leap. The idea that _semantic_ memories are encoded so as to be transmissible via blobs of neural tissue stretches plausibility.

It doesn't seem so implausible: Personality Changes Associated with Organ Transplants (https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3943/5/1/12)

> Personality changes have been reported following organ transplantation. Most commonly, such changes have been described among heart transplant recipients. [...] A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 47 participants (23 heart recipients and 24 other organ recipients) completed an online survey. In this study, 89% of all transplant recipients reported personality changes after undergoing transplant surgery, which was similar for heart and other organ recipients.

Who knows the cause though, could be anything I suppose, not necessarily that "memory sits in tissue".


It's massive, hugely traumatic surgery, taking the patient past what was considered the point of death a century ago, bringing them back alive, and all with the aid of some of the most powerful drugs in modern medicine's arsenal.

And if your heart is needing transplantation in the first place, you'll be running far below optimal for blood O2 and a dozen other things.

It'd be more surprising if it didn't result in significant change.


> if your heart is needing transplantation in the first place, you'll be running far below optimal for blood O2 and a dozen other things.

that's not obvious on the face of it from a mechanical standpoint. I'd you're sick enough to need one, wouldn't we just give you a mechanical temporary replacement, and keep that one going as high as possible instead as low as possible?


By the time you're that sick, you've likely had years of compromised health. That's going to affect personality to some extent.

AFAIK mechanical hearts can be prone to creating blood clots and can put more stress on other parts of the body, so it's not necessarily the safest option to just run it flat out.

Just 47 participants in the online study and a wide variety of psychological issues: “depression, anxiety, psychosis, and sexual dysfunction.”. A few of them found religion.

Is anyone surprised that surviving traumatic surgery with a long debilitating recovery time causes mental stress?


> Is anyone surprised that surviving traumatic surgery with a long debilitating recovery time causes mental stress?

No, but some of the references reports and studies (referenced in the above study), if truthful, would be too much of a coincidence, no?

> a heart and lung transplant at Yale-New Haven hospital in 1988. Following surgery, Sylvia developed a new taste for green peppers and chicken nuggets, foods she previously disliked. As soon as she was released from the hospital, she promptly headed to a Kentucky Fried Chicken to order chicken nuggets. She later met her donor’s family and inquired about his affinity for green peppers. Their response was, “Are you kidding? He loved them… But what he really loved was chicken nuggets”

> a 5-year-old boy received the heart of a 3-year-old boy but was not informed about his donor’s age or cause of death. Despite this lack of information, he provided a vivid description of his donor after the surgery: “He’s just a little kid. He’s a little brother like about half my age. He got hurt bad when he fell down. He likes Power Rangers a lot I think, just like I used to. I don’t like them anymore though” (p. 70, [8]). Subsequently it was reported that his donor had died after falling from an apartment window while trying to reach a Power Ranger toy that had fallen onto the window ledge. After receiving his new heart, the recipient refused to touch or play with Power Rangers

I'm sure there might be other explanations to all of these, but at least people are trying to study it more.


Drugs can alter taste. I've had experience with cancer patients, and a side effect of the treament is that food starts to taste differently. Would not be surprised if the drug+treatment combo of traumatic surgery might result in something similar in some percentage of the patients.

But this doesn't seem to be just "taste changed", but literally "taste changed to what the donor had", that's a bit different, at least in my mind.

Again, not claiming "memory sits in the heart", just that it wouldn't be surprising if there was more to it than just in the brain itself.


Having a suddenly functioning heart probably does wonders for hormone levels and consequently personality.

I once realized that the “snowball” of dread/fear in my chest was likely a minor irregular heartbeat (that I’ve always had) exacerbated in stressful situations.


what do we know about memory other we think in our brains so that's where consciousness must be stored? What do we know about memory that makes that necessarily a leap? What is so special about semantic memory?

Er no. That doesn't happen.

What's funnier is the implication under which the "objection" is stated, as if those researchers didn't/couldn't know it.

Bravo Maestro! Wonderful performance! =)

5 years?! That's a f*cking joke. Democracy and rule of law does not exist any longer. The politicians get richer, no one challenges them, they pass their offices down within their family, taxes get higher and higher, and services worse and worse.

On the other hand, it is fascinating to be able to watch the destruction of europe and western democracy while it is happening! I imagine that this painful slide is what must have happened during the end of the roman empire. Now we're seeing the end of the european/US empire.


Why would you go to your bank by first searching for it? Sounds very insecure to me. I type my banks url directly instead, or if that gets tedious, store it as a bookmark.

I know several people who search for important sites, click uncritically on links, and get scammed. This is not so good.


You'd better read it again, because that claim does not figure in that text. You might mean that with more eyes on the code, more bugs are found, than with no eyes on the code. But that is not what you are saying here.

Here is the relevant quote from _The Cathedral and the Bazaar_[1], which was given the name _Linus's Law_[2] in honor of Linus Torvalds:

> Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.

[1] http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus%27s_law


This consumer couldn't care less about where the person is actually sitting as long as the tasks are done and the problems solved.

"As long as" does a lot of work here, considering language barriers and (in my experience) generally less knowledge in off-shored centers.

No, the side by side idea relates to godlike sentient AI:s. LLM:s are trivial in comparison. It is important to understand that in order for the AI-bros to continue to rake in other peoples money, and keep their bubbles inflated, it must seem credible that they will invent godlike AI tomorrow. That justifies infinite valuations.

When the public no longer belives in that, the bubbles will pop and the AI bros will continue on to the next hype, with yet another generation of small time investors being burned by the popping bubbles.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: