Why do they want to sink the ship and not just park it on some coast? It’s part of history, in sure people would want to tour it.

Afaik, there’s an option for it in Konsole settings?

They are a public company since quite a while.

https://www.cerebras.ai/press-release/cerebras-systems-annou... https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/quote/CBRS/

Hey Claude, make ollama for Jev like models. Make no mistakes /s

hey Claude, download and run vllm nightly for me

(already merged)

GoModel (gateway) already supports Jev like endpoints too

https://gomodel.enterpilot.io/docs/providers/jev

Wow, your mom is so cool!

"Research has shown that being creative through art projects can help promote stress relief, increase self-esteem, help connect with others, and boost intrinsic motivation. So, participating in mindful art projects can open one's mind to more positive thoughts and offer alternative solutions to life problems."

And wise. Well done publishing the Web site which works without fuss in a calm way.

She is flattered :) Your comment and those of others here have "made her day", so thanks!

Btw highly recommend glass workshop like this. I did one and was surprised how easy it was to make a good looking coaster with no artistic talent.

I thought the same! :)

You can also set plan mode as default and start Claude with —allow-dangerously-skip-permissions.

Then you can spent time refining the plan, then shift tab to bypass permissions mode.

This is great. What are some features that you don’t have yet?

Thanks! On the runner/control plane side, most of what is left is adding support for the latest's runner advanced features/fixes. Things like deferred/dynamic matrices, background steps, some edge cases in the old AZDO protocol, step-count expression evaluation etc. On the overall product side, there's quite abit more missing that's planned: support for macos/windows runners, a pass-through cache, an actually nice TUI, a bunch of refactors to make it more extensible, better general observability/logs and alot more work on reliability/performance, and the scheduler.

You can't become "smart" just like that and "learn to think". It takes years od dedicated effort to reach that stage. Getting into a competitive school takes just that - years of dedicated effort.

> "smart guy with access to AI tools" can perform as well as any other trained lawyer

You are seriously understating the ability of a trained lawyer and overstating the ability AI tools.

No, I am not saying that a smart person will outperform a trained lawyer because of the AI tools.

What I am saying is that going to schools no longer is the only way for smart people to be able to do the job of a lawyer.

Going to school was never the only way for smart people to be able to do the job of a lawyer. Law is like consulting and finance in that the “school” part is mostly filtering and socialization and signaling. The actual education is maybe like 1 year of the three years people spend in law school.

AFAIK you can only practice law if you actually went to a school. So there is that...

But maybe I was too subtle in my previous comment. I absolutely agree with you. What I am trying to say is that these schools trying to come up with policies about tests and applications in the age of AI have nothing to do with education. They are all just grasping at whatever straws to try to keep the idea that their institutions are somehow special.

You’re generally correct, but you can become a lawyer without going to law school in 4 states. But this is a relatively modern requirement. ABA lobbying encouraged the policy in 1920 and most states adopted it by the 1940s and 1950s.

Happy to be one of those people contributing those numbers! :) It's a great privacy friendly service.