There are templates: for example

    void print1(auto x){std::cout<< x;}

is a function template

    template <class T>
    void print1(T x){std::cout<< x;}

This is not valid C++14 however, so it doesn't compile. If you replace these, you'll probably still get a stack overflow while expanding the templates because there are almost 7000 arguments to a single function call.

>This is not valid C++14 however, so it doesn't compile.

It is "valid C++" IF there are fewer arguments, like 6-10

The example illustrates C++ internal representation of "variadic functions".

I was referring to the use of generic functions (ie. with an argument with type-specifier auto) which is not C++14. Your copy of g++ may accept it as an extension.

And that works if you use the old C style variadic functions?I suppose I see no reason why it wouldn't, but that isn't the same.

It's actually just the "shina". The "gawa" is 川, river.

What's with capturing large predators? My book on complex analysis euphemizes building a descending sequence of sets which converge to a point by

> If R is the continent of Africa and we select R_n as that subregion which contains the biggest lion in Africa, we have an algorithm for capturing a big lion—we simply build a cage around point z_0.

I can't use Chocolately to install zlib or libpng or SDL or libcurl or GMP or really any of the packages that I would never have to think about installing on Linux, because they were pulled as dependencies long ago. The method for obtaining these on Windows is, as best as I have ever been able to tell, to navigate to each of their webpages and look for Windows releases, which you then download and install yourself, a task I find so daunting that I essentially never write or build programs that have any dependencies whatsoever on my Windows box. This situation is obviously ridiculous so I have to conclude I am doing something very, very wrong.

So, Windows programmers, how do get by without a package manager?

In this example, you probably don't use zlib or libpng or SDL or libcurl or GMP. Your application targets a version of the .NET framework and you use System.IO.Compression, System.Windows.Media.Imaging, DirectX, and whatever the .NET equivalents are for your curl use case and GMP. You might use NuGet to find alternative packages to add to your solution - you are authoring in Visual Studio - for some or all of this. DirectX looks tricky.

Or, if you insist on writing 'unmanaged code,' you are probably finding similar capabilities in native libraries distributed with Windows; it's DirectX's natural environment. Otherwise, you're responsible for doing as you suggest: downloading/compiling the various libraries and stashing them in a nominated area for use by your build toolchain.

Also there's always msys2/mingw64, which does have a package manager (pacman I think?) and you woudl then distribute the necessary runtimes with your program.

Check out MSYS2.

The only information each person has it their own coin, so their strategy is a pair of functions (f,g) from bits to bits, where either fx=y or gy=x (or both) for any bits x and y. There are only four possibilities for f, so picking, at random, f=id, gives g immediately.

I think they meant that http://thelongandshort.org/issues/season-three/images/DeskHe... has the 系 but then the translation the article gives below it is missing the "kei".

Oh, I see! Yeah, that's true.

I found the date on the RSS feed (2015-3-5 21:54).