It does, but I get the distinct feeling that we're putting cart before the horse. I mean, we ought to be able to correctly price wheat and steel better than through ever-growing financial industries and having people use satellites to spy on CEOs.
Would you rather that resources be allocated blindly? The fact that some people can live comfortably off their investments does not mean that the very investments themselves do not create wealth. Hedge funds do the latter, it's up to the government and society to decide on the former - i.e. how to distribute this wealth.
I'm not the OP, but it's a switch I'm strongly considering making. I'm looking at doing it by going back to get a Masters in Quantitative Finance, so that's one possible option.
Use this as your application, don't write anything else:
My summary: 35 years in Silicon Valley; 3 STEM undergrad degrees, MS in AI from Stanford, PhD in AI from a top-10 program; ICPC champion; always considered to be an elite programmer; very current knowledge; constant employment; wide variety of skills; management experience with small teams; very stable life; no vices; very healthy and energetic; I get along with everyone and like working in teams.