To clarify, these are percentages for the sample of students taking the remedial Math 2 class, not generally. Two percent is still crazy low though, that's practically nothing.
The point of the rigidity and uniformity of school is not that it is the best way to get everyone to understand everything if they try. The point is that it forces all the kids to try. School is not just for the most interested, it is for everyone.
No AI you ever create will get a kid to choose learning how math works over doing basically anything else with their time. The point of school is not to teach, it is to discipline children to participate in education. Otherwise, why have it at all? Kids can find extensive information and guides for basically any topic they want on the internet right now.
I work on an air-gapped network. The most important thing that the words "air gap" communicate is that there is no connection, nothing at all, to anything outside the network. The only way to move anything on or off are using disc drives (no USB for security reasons). The word "private network" does not really communicate that there is a physical gap of no wires at all from the computers on the network and everything else on the internet.
What? Strong Towns is not just their "content creation", they ARE local organizations. You might have a chapter in your city. This criticism tells me that you don't know what Strong Towns is, what they do, the actual specific policy guidelines they come up with and push that have real influence on local city planning.
Strong Towns gives actionable proposals all the time, and their main purpose is local organizations to actually do local change. To accuse them of being a content creation scheme that does no organizing tells me that you have not looked into this at all and are making immediate assumptions based on the aesthetics of their content.
On balance, I think Strong Towns has done a lot of good, but in terms of organizing on the ground, I think the two large YIMBY organizations are better at equipping people to make change in their communities:
I happily read and share a lot of Strong Towns content - they do put out a lot of good stuff despite the occasional dud. But in terms of learning how to show up and get things done, I think that's not their strongest spot.
Yeah I think my original comment was too cynical and misplaced when lumping in all of the Strong Towns organization with Not Just Bikes style content. I’ll read through what they have today.
Admittedly my experience might be colored by the fact that they don’t seem to have much of a presence in my home town of Boston - it’s more other groups like the Cyclist Union showing up at meetings carrying forward things like bike lane advocacy, etc.
Why on earth would we ever do that? That's a nonsensical proposal that would immediately make an immense amount of people poor (while also being hostile to so-called foreigners for no reason)
Well I purposely wrote it in a hand-wavy immature way because I don't really understand it. But I did say "if we ever needed to." So whatever the equivalent of declaring bankruptcy is for a country.
Though I would like to amend my nonsense from "a citizen" to "actually in the country" I am imagining cutting off foreign governments and oligarchs, not humans that are actually living here.
Basically, if there was a bad war or something, and we needed to cut ties with most of the world. It's better to be left with the goods than the cash. Because cash has no intrinsic value.
Big correction: we want the value of land to go up. Under our current systems, this corresponds with the price of land going up, but that does not necessarily have to be the case. Taxation of land values causes the value of land to go up while keeping the price of land down, solving both problems at once.
But then we would actually be messing with homeowners capital gains, so I was going to bring this up separately.
I fear the only way to get rid of prop 13 is to buy out the incumbents, in effect. We will compensate for higher property/land taxes with much higher land values, so the lucky incumbents gains are not threatened, but for later generations, the LVT already started high, and the prices low, and capital gains should not be expected.
