Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | alexwasserman's commentslogin

I've very carefully hoarded photos. I don't miss the photos, but I really miss the meta-data, more-so for scanned real photos. I loved photography back in the day, and so took a lot of film photos. Even having scanned them in I've ended up with meta-data around the scan or import date, rather than actual data.

And, anything from a digital camera will be missing things like GPS location, which phones include and I think is great. I've used location search so many times to find photos. I can't always remember when we went somewhere, but pretty often someone will ask about a photo from a trip to X place, and then location search finds it easily.

Photos themselves have bounced between iPhoto, Aperture, Photos, etc but largely remained intact.

The library is backed up to the usual 3 places: a local server (nightly rsync to a ZFS array), stored in iCloud, and in Backblaze, so hopefully safe. And of course, all are on my laptop too.


I've long wondered how much HN karma I could farm by keeping track of the top-X HN blogs and auto-posting the links with a bot.

There are also a number of other blogs I read that are semi-regularly on HN and aren't on the list that I expected to be. Maybe just didn't quite make the top 100, and I'm over-indexing on my personal preferences. eg. Matt Levine's Money Stuff crops up semi-often, and Bret Devereaux of ACOUP gets most of his posts on HN.


> I've long wondered how much HN karma I could farm by keeping track of the top-X HN blogs and auto-posting the links with a bot.

A lot: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=todsacerdoti


I think that account was compromised a while back, it looks fine now again. I don't get the point though, why even bother making a repost bot. It's not like they gain anything from it.

Not that I have anything against the top bloggers, but I do hope the 2026 list will differ from the 2025 list. I'm here to read about varied tech content!


My father was gifted a pair of these for his 50th birthday, would have been 1989, in London.

Little ICE scooters. They were a lot of fun and not very safe. We had drunk guests damaging themselves in the street.

They became toys for my brothers and I, who had plenty of accidents but learnt to ride them reasonably.

The engines didn’t idle particularly well and had no gears. You had to pull start, hop on and go quickly while reving just enough to idle without it moving. It took practice. You could push start too with some practice, especially once warm.

Lots of fun, but mileage wouldn’t have been great for serious use and refilling a pain at a regular petrol station. Might have been 2-stroke, I can’t remember. Tiny engine, closer to a strimmer than lawnmower.

Huge fun though for just bombing around on as a tween and young teen.


Must have been two stroke, 4 stroke motors are too large and heavy for an application like that.


According to Wikipedia

> The engine was an air-cooled, 4-stroke, 155 cc engine over the front wheel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autoped


Guess I was wrong, that’s a shocking engineering choice, that engine looks massive and heavy. A four stroke engine is about twice the weight and size for the same power output, but much more fuel efficient.


"Fuel efficient" - that's probably why. If the fuel efficiency more than off sets the additional weight, for range then four stroke might be indicated. There are lots of other factors to consider.


Four stroke engines are also quieter, last longer, and have lower emissions, but cost a lot more to make as they are much more complex.


I guess this is an old engine, but it's bizarre to me that fuel efficiency could be a factor for something this slow and light.


Presumably carrying fuel on the device was a consideration so greater fuel efficiency helps reduce the amount of petrol you’re lugging around.


A major factor if you actually are using it to get anywhere, because it’s likely not practical to carry more than a liter or so of fuel.


I have been particularly irritated in the past where people use a lower log level and include the higher log level string in the message, especially where it's then parsed, filtered, and alerted on my monitoring.

eg. log level WARN, message "This error is...", but it then trips an error in monitoring and pages out.

Probably breaching multiple rules here around not parsing logs like that, etc. But it's cropped up so many times I get quite annoyed by it.


> I have been particularly irritated in the past where people use a lower log level and include the higher log level string in the message, especially where it's then parsed, filtered, and alerted on my monitoring.

If your parsing, filtering, and monitoring setup parses strings that happen to correspond to log level names in positions other than that of log levels as having the semantics of log levels, then that's a parsing/filtering error, not a logging error.


Stuff like that is a good argument for using structured logging, but even if you are just parsing text logs, surely you can make the parser be a bit more specific when retrieving the log level.


"It could have overwhelmed cell towers, toppling New York City’s cell service and preventing every Manhattan resident from accessing Google Maps."

Seems odd that the most important use they can highlight for cell service in NYC is accessing Google Maps. Not accessing 911, not some other vital use of cell service, but Google Maps.

NYC is full of free Wifi all over the place. So many McDs, Starbucks, and other restaurants and sites you can get Google Maps anywhere.


I’ve lived through enough cellular downtimes to have Google offline maps


Especially at larger companies there’s very little difference between $10, $100, $1000, $10,000 from the perspective of the effort put in to pay for it.

You’re putting the same requests and forms, doing the same due diligence, getting the same approvals, etc. All contracts need to go through the same contract review, etc.

Few places I’ve worked have sensible rules to bypass that.

You still need to make sure you’re value for money, but aren’t as constrained as absolute price as much.


Yes, I see what you mean. In our main product, where billing is per seat and we work with somewhat small-med biz, the subscription form after the trial asks how many seats you want to pay for. It’s possible to choose more seats than the number of users at that moment, which means those seats can be filled later without extra charges/invoices.

From time to time, we see cases where a single user signs up but purchases 20–50 seats for a year upfront. That’s still always surprising me in a good sense.

The whole topic of seats could actually be a separate discussion on its own, 'cause there are many nuances, good/bad approached and funny situations we’ve run into along the way ))


Project Binky is well worth a watch if you enjoy car restoration, upgrades/rebuilding, and generally extreme make-overs on classic cars.


What’s he a whistleblower of? He didn’t work at JS, so it’s not there.

This report seems off. From other more trustworthy sources (eg BBG/Levine) JS were trading the illiquid stock market to move options prices. This says large options volumes were moving options markets. Even if manipulated, and that’s not clear, he has it backwards.


Well that took me back.

For some reason no friends or family took me seriously when I brought it up at the time.


We did this when we renovated. Had a kitchen wall section chalk board painted for notes, as well as a much larger section of the kids play room wall.

The notes was useful space on the kitchen and the playroom one the kids just loved to doodle. Their friends were always impressed and loved to be able to leave a tag or doodle on it when they came over.

We tried a layer of magnetic paint too, but it didn’t work nearly as well.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: