ChatGPT is a great bullshit generator, and in working in corporate jobs will need a lot of bullish.
I usually have already an answer or something that must be done and say to ChatGPT, write this, but in a more professional tone or with more buzzwords. ChatGPT is amazing in creating verbose output that sound professional and entrepris-y.
When I have a yes/no answer but need 3 paragraphs for some bullshit reason, ChatGPT always deliver great results. I am very satisfied with ChatGPT and recommend it for all your bullshit needs.
In fact, let's try it now:
"ChatGPT demonstrates exceptional proficiency in generating elaborate discourse, particularly advantageous in contexts demanding nuanced communication. In the realm of corporate environments, effective articulation is often bolstered by a certain degree of strategic language.
Frequently, I find myself in situations necessitating succinct and polished content, and I consistently leverage ChatGPT to achieve this objective. This platform excels in producing comprehensive textual outputs that exude professionalism and sophistication, aligning seamlessly with the requisites of business communication.
Moreover, when confronted with queries warranting a concise response, yet necessitating a more extensive explanation, ChatGPT consistently produces outcomes that align with the complexities of such demands. This reliable capacity has considerably enhanced my operational efficiency and overall content quality.
In light of these observations, I express my utmost satisfaction with the capabilities of ChatGPT. Its aptitude for generating refined discourse is commendable and I confidently recommend it to address various professional communication requirements."
This already exists. Why you are reinventing the wheel again?!?
A lot of programs already implement the XDG Base Directory Specification[1], putting the configuration in the .config directory. These programs should just follow the ALREADY EXISTING specification.
If you want to understand it, the arch wiki[2] have a good explanation about all the directories.
This proposal calls for developers to adopt a standard within their projects, as opposed to addressing where configuration files for installed software should live within a user's home directory.
This site exists to advocate that software libraries look for their config files in .meta directories of projects.
This is avoid making a mess in the root directory of projects, as this tweet laments.
## Basics
The XDG Base Directory Specification is based on the following concepts:
- There is a single base directory relative to which user-specific data files should be written. This directory is defined by the environment variable $XDG_DATA_HOME.
I am able to do a perfect multi-monitor high-DPI/mixed-DPI on Linux using wayland+gnome. The support for wayland on KDE is getting better and would probably work with KDE as well. This was a huge annoyance, but is fixed. I don`t even remember I am using wayland. Everything works.
With Steam progress on proton, most games run on Linux without problems and with the same performance.
Another huge pain in Linux was installing commercial programs. Now with flatpak, you can be sure it will work no matter what.
If I am not mistaken, it this is only trained on the preview and not on the entire song.
If you listen to a music with a real intro, it gives strange results. For example: "Goodbye Blue Sky - Pink Floyd" (https://maroofy.com/songs/1065976153)
I am happy you are in a better head space. The fact you can enjoy reading internet comments is a great testament to that!
The zeitgeist of our times is categorization, valuation, discrimination... This is good or bad, valid or invalid. There is very little space for the flaws of the real world. To divide the world so clearly, violence is necessary. Be the clinical wording of the surgeon or the hate of the mob...
There is so much hate on the internet; Remember it is not personal, they do not know you.
This is an observational study, not strong enough to make any conclusions; The determination if a patient had taken ivermectin was self-reporting. There is no control of the dosage and how much time the patients took ivermectin before getting covid.
This is at best an indication of the need for better studies about the subject, but considering that Brazil's president is rabid pro-ivermectin and this was made in a medium city in a region favorable at the president, take this with a grain of salt.
Additionally, it was done in southern Brazil where worms are endemic. Being infected with worms is a known comorbidity of Covid-19. Treating the worms with Ivermectin has been shown to have a small improvement in chance of death from Covid-19. This doesn't apply to the US, of course.
We are two years into a pandemic. There isn't coming an answer to ivermectin. There should have been an answer 18 months ago, but the sycophantic vaccine pushers have done everything they can not to discredit ivermectin, but to simply say there isn't enough evidence to prove its effectiveness. Also, the only way to do this is to claim massive widescale multi-country research fraud.
I don't have a position on ivermectin, but it's pretty clear that any actual pre-treatmwent repurposing of drugs for any future pandemic should be the tip of the spear, but will be oppressed, underfunded, attacked, false-flagged, strawmanned, degraded, and doctor prescribers attacked.
This is totally, totally backwards. Even at $100,000,000 a clinical trial, funding 100 drugs with repurpose potential should have been step 1.
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were met with cautious optimism by the research community after the first preliminary hits in screening experiments for drug repurposing, exactly as you’re advocating [0]. The tides turned when things didn’t pan out in subsequent clinical studies. Actually, for ivermectin the tide started turning after people realized what an unrealistically massive dose was needed in the first in vitro study [0 again]
There were a few cases of fraud (most notably one of the biggest ivermectin studies last summer) but it’s not necessary to resort to allegations of ubiquitous fraud to conclude that the research doesn’t really support use of these drugs as effective Covid therapeutics
Some studies, especially in the southern hemisphere, were quite sold on ivermectin, but there is a lot of suspicion that the good results are actually due to worms increasing the risk of Covid death.
So if you're from the US and your aunt from Florida/Louisiana tells you Ivermectin work, you can honestly respond: Yes.
Is there any reason why worms would increase the severe morbidity/death rate?
The only thing I can think off is that (some) parasites tend to have a suppressive impact on the immune system but it also seem that could also prevent the cytokine storm that initially was reported as a major cause of severe illness and death.
Sorry to say, but the vaccine is a better option to prevent covid, even considering this study. You can take ivermectin if you use the normal dosage, it is not harmful and may be helpful. But a lot of people is promoting ivermectin instead of the vaccine or using a higher dosage and this is causing a lot of preventable deaths.
I usually have already an answer or something that must be done and say to ChatGPT, write this, but in a more professional tone or with more buzzwords. ChatGPT is amazing in creating verbose output that sound professional and entrepris-y.
When I have a yes/no answer but need 3 paragraphs for some bullshit reason, ChatGPT always deliver great results. I am very satisfied with ChatGPT and recommend it for all your bullshit needs.
In fact, let's try it now: "ChatGPT demonstrates exceptional proficiency in generating elaborate discourse, particularly advantageous in contexts demanding nuanced communication. In the realm of corporate environments, effective articulation is often bolstered by a certain degree of strategic language.
Frequently, I find myself in situations necessitating succinct and polished content, and I consistently leverage ChatGPT to achieve this objective. This platform excels in producing comprehensive textual outputs that exude professionalism and sophistication, aligning seamlessly with the requisites of business communication.
Moreover, when confronted with queries warranting a concise response, yet necessitating a more extensive explanation, ChatGPT consistently produces outcomes that align with the complexities of such demands. This reliable capacity has considerably enhanced my operational efficiency and overall content quality.
In light of these observations, I express my utmost satisfaction with the capabilities of ChatGPT. Its aptitude for generating refined discourse is commendable and I confidently recommend it to address various professional communication requirements."
See? IT IS AMAZING!!!