something i've noticed: internet is different from TV in the amount of text on screen, even simply ads and interfaces is a lot of text.
I'd be interested to know if this makes children "text-blind" and relates to increased struggles with reading and writing as they get older. It seems a theme in 6-10 year olds from teachers at the moment.
I don't know about the rest of Europe, but in Spain, this happens because people are extremely dependent on government handouts. Most people dislike the government's policies, but they are afraid of having to work, so they don't want to rock the boat.
State dependents - either benefits/welfare or employed - have a very different experience of the economy than others; the disconnected work/pay relationship.
The disconnect between income and effort is causing people to have warped priorities, which, ultimately, results in inflationary economics and impoverishment.
It isn't. But reform would a political suicide, because all of these people are voters. So the status quo continues, and for now everyone can feel great about how caring the society is.
It never gets to that in countries already deeply aligned.
They all agree on this because it will be a hidden sticking point for some others,
If that's not an impediment some lobyists will make it so.
If that doesn't work us ambassadors, state departments and/or USTR will pressure or even put you on a trade watchlist.
If that doesn't work some 3 letter agency folks will land on a domestic airfield and have some talks.
If that doesn't work some media might peculiarly shift it's tone.
etc
Like how you never stab your enemies because you'd go to jail, even though it never gets to jail because you don't stab your enemies because you'd go to jail
Indeed tho we of course also have rare examples of what happens when someone does stab someone which keeps the memory fresh and spain did get the state department and USTR pressure in the past, sweden nearly ended up on the 301 Watchlist. The cia did both use foreign/multinational media for it's goals and defended it's interests, etc
With new tools (i.e., LLMs) it feels like software engineering is moving to an assembly process.
The best engineers will have an awareness of overall problem, architecture, how pieces should fit together and what changes when the fits are made.
The top-tier will be able to adjust components, and identify gaps which can be filled by newly created, but properly shaped components to create new emergent properties from the combinations.
This has always been a requirement, but intertwined with the expression of the vision by coding. Are those two things really separate? I don't think people can be architects without coding, but I'm an old man with old ideas!
Like a see-saw - we just need that balance, man!!!
reply