I think #3 is a very strong reason. You could ostensibly get over the price, comfort, and quirks if you actually found it useful. Apple seems to be betting that some use-case or app will materialize and change this for them.
:P when is Zuck Coke? This watch like a value sales pitch. We removed that feature, we going to add it back. For most of you, our product is better. And Cheaper in cost.
To clarify, the example is purely to highlight the pointlessness of asking such direct competitors for a meaningful evaluation of the others product.
It does not intended to mean Pepsi and coke companies are similar to Apple vs Facebook.
And actually my example doesn’t nearly convey how pointless it is to ask zuck about a competitor’s vr system. Zuck bet so big on his own VR dreams he renamed his company after VR.
It’s an emotional thing. Most place can’t handle it. Non profit is one place where some of it is open to the public via 990.
We human are not as in control as we thing we are. When those chemical kicks in, it takes a good deal of efforts to reason yourself out of it. This assumes you are aware of it happening.
In general, the one on the fringe building and gaing traction will rise to take over and so on it goes. Builders will find a way or find an excuse.