But did they tell you to "think about accelerating your adoption of IPv6 as a modernization and conservation measure" when they announced the charges? Because AWS did.
As mentioned in the footnote, this can be done by using PrivateLink; it costs a few bucks too, but it is the way to go if your VPC does not (or must not, for Compliance™ reasons) have internet connectivity.
If your target VPC has neither PrivateLink nor public IPv4 connectivity somewhere, I'm not sure how that would work; I'd love to learn how that was built.
Yeah, sure, we use PrivateLink. In my opinion, it's clickbait to say "almost no AWS API can be used from a VPC without public IPv4 addresses" with a footnote "actually most can if you use the service that enables that".
Indeed. I really don't like the thought, but I more and more believe that there is no other way to incentivize IPv6 at the "server side". The client (end user) side seems to do well, considering that Google reports IPv6 end user traffic of almost 50% these days.
Does this break in iOS 18 or does this affect only self-signed (untrusted) certificates?