hijacking this, what is the best local model (and tool to use it) for programming, if i only have 256gb ssd on a mac? im very used to codex and while i get that it will never be this smart locally, is there any coding model like it, not too heavy on space?
If you click a domain, you'll see its details page, and there's a direct link at the top as well as direct links to all of the domain's front page stories.
Repo: https://github.com/arajnoha/phodo
ultra minimalist web todo app (php+html+css).
stores everthing in single JSON, has a day view, allows you only to mark as done, delete and add. list days back and forth + jump to today. When task is added while listing days, its added to that listed day.
PHP and CSS are both below 100 LOC.
Im working on simplyfing the code further.
I tried really all of the "productivity" stuff to stay organised.
Got angry multiple times, went to pen and paper, was OK, but i felt i just need a slight glimps of tech to make it more functional. Something little more than plaintext file, but not much.
So I got, like many others, caught into the productivity cycle, trying to find the best app for this and that. Notetaking, todo lists, calendars.
And all are extremely bloated or paid.
I fell in love with the todo.txt CLI program and simply made a web equivalent, so I can perform those simple actions on the go from iOS as well.
I initially made a robust PWA, but then started to question every part until i got to 100 LOC.
Im considering a box listing the overdue stuff, but that will be the last overhead.
Most todo tools assume every item is a task. In reality I need one inbox for mixed things: tasks, events, links, movie/book tips, random reminders.
Cappu’s flow is: capture fast now, process later in a focused pass, then work from sorted views (workspace + timeline).
It’s a mobile-first PWA (no App Store), and you can test all features for free. Paywall is only for account sync/server storage across devices.
I’d love feedback from HN on the workflow itself: does “capture first, classify later” make sense, or would you do it differently?
reply