And much of it inaccessible to others, let alone to AI

Time will tell whether it’s a crazy position or not. The best we can do is make our own choices.

It is a crazy position. Time will tell whether it'll get infectious and blow up.

AGI with people skills?

Do you doubt? Already plenty of people prefer people skills of AI chatbots to those of other people.

Chatbots are more considerate than many people I know. They at least explain things in a calm way.

There are less reductive forms of materialism. For the view of a Nobel prize physics laureate see A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down by Robert B. Laughlin. From the philosophy world, read Manuel DeLanda or Alicia Juarrero.

In my household, we refer to coins as “parking tokens”.

Trolley tokens for me. I just keep a couple of quid in my car for supermarkets that need a coin for the trolley

I should start calling my jar of quarters the "laundry tokens" haha.

Can you be one without the other? Serious question – I’ve written five books, and the first draft was like 5% of the work.

Sure. But I still want to do that 5%, because that's the part I enjoy the most. :/

> 3. Why the Obvious Answer Fails: The Center-of-Mass Trap

I'm pretty sure that's incorrect. The whole point of the center of mass is that it's at the intersection of all the bisecting lines. If you slice a shape in two and you don't get two parts of equal area then you didn't pass through the center of mass.

The vertial bisection of this:

  XX
  XX
  XX|XXXXXXXXXX
  XX
  XX

is the | symbol, but the center of mass is near the o in the next graphic.

  XX
  XX
  XXXXoXXXXXXXX
  XX
  XX

You're just asserting that. Why would the center of mass be further to the right from the vertical bisection? That would make it so the left side has a mass of 12.5 versus 8.5 on the right. If you were to pivot that shape freely from that point, it wouldn't stay balanced, it would swing until it ends up as an upside-down T.

You must consider how far away from the point they are in the horizontal direction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_of_mass#Definition

This is very unbalanced: 30 to the right and 55 to the left.

  21
  21
  21|123456789A
  21
  21

This is almost balanced (my graphic is not perfect). 38 the right and 36 to the left.

  43
  43
  4321o12345678
  43
  43

Fair enough. I was thinking of center of mass as equivalent to the centroid and only taking into account geometric shape, not leverage.

Ah, thanks. Now that I think of it, the "center of mass" is the center of equal torque.

You can @decorate a for-loop?

I wish there were easier ways to play with syntax in Python, but there we are.

My take (several years old now) https://www.agendashift.com/done