Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | atenni's commentslogin

> I agree it would have been nicer if the message was more polite. But if you compare that to having the backbone follow through with meaningful long-term changes against a corporation you don't trust or respect, there shouldn't even be a discussion.

You’re framing it as either/or when it isn’t. You can push for real change and communicate like an adult. The two aren’t in conflict; often they reinforce each other.


> The two aren’t in conflict; often they reinforce each other

I’d think they _are_ inherently in conflict. Every person has 24 hours per day, and they can spend them on researching and doing what’s right or on reaching consensus. There is some mutual reinforcement to some extent (as it’s usually right to have a reasonable consensus on what’s the right choice), but beyond some basic level there’s always tradeoff.

And for programming language designers, I really appreciate when they make the right long-term choices even if I don’t understand initially why they were made.


Python’s PEP 723 (Inline script metadata) has a section summarising why they couldn’t take this approach under “Why not infer the requirements from import statements?”

https://peps.python.org/pep-0723/#why-not-infer-the-requirem...


If I’m hiring a web developer and you give me a `resume.html` you’d best believe I’m viewing source on that.

This is a high-risk high-reward game, because if it’s clean you’ll get bonus points, but if there’s unnecessary cruft (as defined by me) you’ll loose points.

For example, while this is pretty clean code, I’m currently on my phone and getting horizontal scroll bars. For a text based site like this resume that shouldn’t happen, and perhaps unfairly, that’s going to weigh heavily against the other good work OP has done.


Then it's good thing he doesn't do that and instead converts it to PDF before sending.


`grid-template-columns: max-content 1fr;` is preventing the text from wrapping in `header` elements. Should be a simple fix, but it'd definitely loose some points from me.


A lot of people here are assuming this will involve API calls to OpenAI’s servers.

If a deal is made it will almost certainly be to self host OpenAI’s models, the same way Microsoft does. Apple will use RAG to ground requests in the user’s own iCloud data, and no user data will be sent to OpenAI or be used to train any OpenAI models.


I think OpenAI would be happy to cut a deal. Microsoft already self-host their GPT4 models for MS Copilot.


Looks like the tests were run on a private line belonging to an airport. From the associated PDF[0]:

> “Testing was conducted at the outdoor three-phase powerline setup at HCA Airport in Odense, Denmark at the disposal of the authors…”

[0]: https://findresearcher.sdu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/25601008...


It’s at the very end of the blog post:

“The maximum size of a key value store is 5 MB, and you can associate a single key value store to each function. The maximum size of a key is 512 bytes. Values can be up to 1KB in size.“


Thanks, should've grepped for "max". But the amount of keys wasn't mentioned.


A bank creating an operating system ...what could go wrong?


Definitely still a thing with Azure and Atlassian


Could you elaborate or drop some links? Are people getting discounts on Azure cloud bills with certifications?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: