Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | atopal's commentslogin

Unless you have specified something else, Modern Web Guidance assumes that you are targeting Baseline Widely Available, meaning all major browsers going back 2.5 years. Everything has to either be a progressive enhancement or have a fallback that works in those browsers. Otherwise you have to explicitly ask for that feature. This is a policy that was worked out with Microsoft Edge and Mozilla Firefox, who are also contributing to the skill.

Not only is it asking the agent, the guides themselves spell out how to make a fallback work in unsupported browsers. That's not just Firefox and Safari, if it's a Chrome only feature older versions of Chrome might not support it either. Here's an example: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/modern-web-guidance-src/blob...

Unless you have specified something different, by default the skill assumes you are targeting Baseline Widely Available, which means everything has to work in all major browsers from at least 2.5 years ago.


That's because Chrome on Android has a partial implementation of Web Serial. The banner on top is to get information at a glance vs the detailed breakdown of the compatibility table.


The maximum amount of energy generated from nuclear in Germany was 171TWh in 2001 [0]. In 2020 solar and wind generated 175TWh and in 2025 they generated 206TWh [1].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Germany [1] https://www.smard.de/home/marktdaten?marketDataAttributes=%7...


Here is an histogram of the energy mix 1990-2020 that illustrates your answer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Energymix_Germany.svg

The nuclear share (red) is reducing during the 200Os. The wind and solar (light blue and yellow) went over the max nuclear share at the end of the period — it seems there is much more wind than sun in Germany ;-). The fossil fuels (dark colors below red) are still very high.


Yes, solar and wind has produced a few percents more in total, after years of subsidies with >18 Billion Euro tax subsidies yearly. But we still need gas and coal plants, because wind and solar fail to produce when energy is needed. We had 573 hours of negative prices in 2025 https://www.enoplan.de/strommarkt-2025-573-stunden-mit-negat...

In summary, we still need fossil fuels, and we have high prices, and we need to pay other countries to get rid of the waste electricity. This is just an utter failure from any economic or climate perspective. Just think of all the clean energy we could export - when it is needed - with nuclear plants still intact. We could have helped austria and poland to reduce their fossil footprint as well!


I was just correcting your numbers, but I also want to point out that power generated from solar has grown more than 30% in just two years and I think it's uncontroversial that we are in the early stages of the s curve for adoption. Negative prices are obviously an arbitrage opportunity that Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are in the process of capitalizing on.


Fossil fuel plants are also subsidized, in part by health spending.


It’s called SSI, spectral similarity index. SSI is specified for a color temperature, eg 3200 or 5600. 100 is identical to tungsten or sunlight. Values above 85 are good.


In the UK I've not been able to find high wattage (10-20W) LED lightbulbs with high CRI, some don't even mention it in listings, let alone SSI, which I have never seen.

Where are you seeing these? Is this industrial/commercial suppliers?


It’s rare, unfortunately, and usually not in the typical bulb formats. Here’s one for example with an SSI of 89 for tungsten: https://amarancreators.com/products/amaran-100x-s?Title=Defa...


Phillips, try searching for EyeComfort. I think all of their premium bulbs have 80+ Ra.


GE Relax is my preference, with 93 Ra. A good all-around bulb.

https://www.housebeautiful.com/shopping/a31139492/ge-relax-l...


They look good, but cannot find a listings with all the details though to know exactly what I will get if I buy them.

It is a good start and I know know its wroth looking, so think you.


It’s terrible discoverability, but a single click seems to do the trick, no long press necessary.


Ooh thank you!


Anchor positioning is part of Interop 2025. Firefox committed to shipping support for it this year: https://wpt.fyi/interop-2025

After that, it should take about 2.5 years for the feature to become Baseline widely available, and depending on your audience[0], you might be able to use it even sooner.

[0]: https://web.dev/blog/whats-my-baseline


Current status: Depends on fixes for 25 other bug tracker items:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=css-anchor-posi...


Reminds me of the hunger stones in Germany and neighboring countries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_stone


If you mean "driven or steered remotely": They were never teleoperated. I'm assuming that would be completely reckless given the nature of radio networks and possibly because of regulations. The car will call a service once it can't make a decision (this is only when the car is fully stopped), and a human will decide to send out a driver or make a decision in the moment.


It’s called learned helplessness and is a good indicator for pessimism. There is a book I enjoyed that discusses the issue in depth, called: Learned Optimism, by Martin Seligman. The second half of the book is about how to become less of a pessimist, by addressing learned helplessness.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: