When their flie opening dialog on macOS opens up, if I go into a folder by mistake, and I want to go to the parent folder.. It's not possible.
Why or how would some designer say "Perfect". The context of a filesystem browser requires those actions, level up from current directory is a basic feature. Hell worst case just give me the entire current directory path as a string and I can remove the current folder and go.
It is mind boggling how they're aclaimed for being so innovative with UI/UX and yet get the foundational basics so wrong.
There's a back button, which if you just went into a child folder from a parent folder, then pressing the back button will go to the parent folder.
If you explicitly want to go to the parent folder, clicking on the name of the current folder in the dropdown in the top center of the open dialog, will reveal a list of folders that is the hierarchy from current folder on top, to root folder on bottom.
You can also press Command + Up Arrow to go to the parent folder.
To edit the path as text, press Shift + Command + G, which will show a dialog with the current path, and allow you to edit it as text with autocomplete support.
Bonus tip: While in the file open dialog, if for some reason you want open the current directory in a full normal Finder window, press Command + R.
Agreed it’s dumb to be off by default, but I get it. You can change it: To show the file path in macOS, you can enable the Path Bar in Finder by clicking on View > Show Path Bar. This will display the full hierarchy of the selected file or folder at the bottom of the Finder window.
Not the one you are replying to, but an argument I heard is that
1) It is now much easier to work in a language with better security features such as Rust. Previously, there definitely was some kind of trade-off between accessibility, performance, and security, and some people argue that this is over. I don't know if this is true, but it seems plausible.
2) You can now translate your legacy projects to a different language much more easily. This is definitely true, but that doesn't mean it doesn't introduce new/other problems or that it is easy enough (again, I simply don't know).
2 makes sense. 1 is immensely scary as an argument.
If you don't understand the language(eg, not easy to work with), don't work professionally in it. All LLM work need audit, a second set of eyes, just as work from a coworker needs peer review prior to sign off.
How can one peer review an LLM without full, experienced knowledge?
So basically, thanks for building our business side of Facebook for all those years, we are changing the rules of the game now in so if you want to continue using our service, we get to use all of your website's data however we like in perpetuity.
There isn't even a veil of "customer satisfaction is important" anymore.
If there's a know CVE in a version of cPanel ir wordpress for example, those platforms broadcast what version they're on, so the matching cve being known is not illegal. You're just correlating known vulnerable versions without doing any probing. Pen testing however, a bit more involved in pulling info out without permission is illegal.
Depressing to know that these CVEs were known since August.. and not one manufacturer forced an update to their always online devices.. and the regular customer will foot the bill for the incompetency.
I would say this qualifies no?
They certainly didn't get 25 Billion in fees from Cambridge analítica. Unless they did any my conception of business is just way off.
reply