Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | catoc's commentslogin

I don’t see the downside here.

If you don’t believe it, maybe disconnect from network before dropping the file?


A wise doctor once typed…


They’re looking for AI that’s só good it’s unreal


” it’s not a big deal. Just gets you better ads.”

I thought this was just ignorance.

Then I checked the profile. They ”have lots of experience with digital advertising “


Really? So the profile is like an ad-bot. Good to know. It was the only account that tried to promote ads; everyone else hates ads, so they don't write in a positive tone about them.


Just disable Liquid Glass (transparency, motion). Better UX and better UI


Does this work, i.e. does this reduce the load on the processor and battery? Did someone measure it?


I tried it, the effect is unnoticeable and it ruins the UI experience.

But to say that to use a one year old phone I need to disable screen effects on a new OS should be grounds for a lawsuit.


It is a really pleasant language, but I think the <nonnull> annotation is for initialization only - compiler checking against initializing an object ptr with a null value - and does not prevent crashing when addressing an already released object


> does not prevent crashing when addressing an already released object

I don’t know what behavior you’d expect here or in what situation you’d encounter this for a nonnull reference. You’d have to be really living dangerously I’d imagine. The footgun was that nonnull isn’t enforced. And anyway, leaks were more the issue.


That was exactly my point.

GP mentioned ‘chasing null pointer exceptions’, then parent mentioned that the language ’now does have nonnull annotation’, prompting me to explain that that does not prevent null pointer exceptions.

So, not living a dangerously. All that can be held against me is being “dangerously” imprecise on HN - definitely not good either


Isn’t your own username also associated with animal parts?


Would renaming to ”Nearby Glassholes” be acceptable as a PR?


2014, that name, similar thing https://julianoliver.com/projects/glasshole/


Give it a try ^^


“When using the app you are likely to experience false positives, and when the app alerts you, smart glasses are probably nearby.”

Nothing contradictory there.

Even “…when the app alerts you, smart glasses are likely nearby” might be reasonable.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: