This is incorrect advice. It's fine to power via the header power pins (these are NOT gpio pins as the author claims, but are instead power pins on the pin header). The transient suppressor the author mentions isn't as valuable when you are hard wired via the header power pins, the TVS is necessary when you are plugging and unplugging the usb cables and there could be significant voltage differences in the cable vs. your PI that could cause damage. If you are direct connected and not plugging / unplugging there isn't an issue if the TVS components are bypassed because there aren't transients like that occurring.
SpaceX-the-space-launch-business is doing amazing things, which is part of what makes it so sad that the financials and buzz is all for SpaceX-the-enterprise-AI-business.
Their S-1 projects $28 trillion TAM, with 93% of that attributed to AI, ~6% to connectivity via Starlink, and only ~1% for space launch capability.
Of their $20 billion CapEx spent in 2025, 60% was spent towards AI data-centers, 20% was spent towards Starlink satellites, and ~20% was spent towards actually building Starship and Falcon 9. That's gone up to nearly 80% towards AI in Q1 2026.
Of course, "AI" makes up only ~20% of their current revenues.
So... this company is priced as an AI startup but it's actually a satellite internet and space launch business.... or is it? Shame to see the coolest thing that Elon did be eaten by the AI monster.
It depends on if you mean the space part or the nascent AI mega company SpaceX is pretending to be. The ipo claimed the space launches would only be a small part of their future profits and business and that they'd reach a 7 trillion dollar TAM or etc - this isn't a good sign for that promise.
If Prasad thought this needed more research then it needed more research. He and the people he works with have written dozens, maybe hundreds now, of reports that expose studies that lack the rigor for definitive results, have misleading endpoints, have imbalanced arms etc. I get that anything that would slow vaccines down has somehow become political and lots of people would gladly accept the pharmaceutical companies word on things. This is a blindness due to political leanings and not evidence based. If Prasad says it needs more and better data I'd put money on it needing it.
I'd like to remind people reading this that are concerned about it that there is a LOT you can do to improve the world.
If many reduced their energy consumption and material waste there would be a measurable reduction in CO2. Buy things only when you need them, reuse or find a new home for things before discarding them. Keep you tires inflated, buy efficient vehicles. Improve home insulation, consider a heat pump heating and cooling system when the time comes, etc.
Don't let this be a problem because you can't get government to force your neighbors to do it, take the initiative to lead by example.
Looks like this is in response to the Apple paper from a couple of weeks ago about memory tagging. Excellent news even if this wasn't pushed along by Apple.
I follow Vinay Prasad (https://substack.com/@vinayprasadmdmph) to keep up on these topics. It feels like getting a portal to the future in some way as he's on the cutting edge of analyzing the quality of the analysis in a ton of papers. You get to see what conclusions are likely to change in the next handful of years as the information becomes more widespread.
The irony that the judge would likely have held you in contempt if you didn't obey one of their orders but seems to think it's ok to help people pursued by other law enforcement to skip out. The judge should know that even they aren't above the law and they can't override other judicial and administrative rulings just because they disagree with them.
> if any attorney or other court official “knows or believes that a person feels unsafe coming to the courthouse to courtroom 615,” they should notify the clerk and request an appearance via Zoom.
Did I miss an alternative explanation from the judge?
"minimum 10% tariff on all imported goods and materials" certainly sounds like a way to increase costs.
Increasing costs seems generally worse for an economy than decreasing costs.
I feel like most people could follow this logical chain of reasoning to a conclusion of "thus you have a elevated risk for an economic recession compared to the state of affairs before the tariffs."
“WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!),” Trump said in a social media post. “BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”
“If Trump succeeds in forcing through mass deportations, combined with Elon hacking away at the government, firing people and reducing the deficit - there will be an initial severe overreaction in the economy…Market will tumble. But when the storm passes and everyone realizes we are on sounder footing, there will be a rapid recovery to a healthier, sustainable economy.”
There's a theory going around that the administration wants to crash the market so they can buy everything up for cheap, in a similar way to what happened in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union.
At the same time though it seems like the current president has always been pro tariffs even though they are almost always bad for a economy, the reason why the admin is applying a lot more of them is because almost everyone left in the admin's circle is a yes men.
Glad we've got some competition in this space. Qualcomm was the only manufacturer with top tier performance for several years.
I'm a bit skeptical of how much "AI" is going on here but given the number of parameters in RF systems its not a surprise that ML could be trained on them to reduce the necessity to perform things algorithmically and outperform what a human could describe and code.
