With this logic, what is the point to read a book about false events that did not happen? Can we please stop attacking everyone's version of fun or what makes them happy just because it isn't exactly what we like?
It's not that either. I just explained what it is. It's for those who already want to share Kagi with others, and who didn't have a good way to pitch it before. It's not really an advertisement to those who don't already have a Kagi advocate locally. It's also not really "wanting" you to distribute anything. It's merely a convenience that is available. That's all.
Yes in my experience, AI designs might look okay on first glance but when you really start to look you start to see strange and inconsistent things. Similar to looking at generated code.
You can have it fix these things. It has the tools to analyze screenshots of the app and correct things like formating, alignment, color, etc.
I've been building a personal app with Opus 4.8 over the past two weeks and the design is excellent. I provided it with screenshots of what I wanted, then had it build out a gallery of functional UI elements (like designers do). Claude built out a tool that would screenshot the app, compare it to the design screenshot and automatically reposition elements or update the styles to match.
You can also provide it with a style guideline prompt and have it double check all the work it produced matches the UI style guidelines before committing.