Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chromehearts's commentslogin

I don't know but this AI wrapper tool will never create something life changing imo..

But that stargraph is ridiculous .. absolutely crazy


Old english using "ne" as a negative concord is definitely borrowed from the french right?

No, Old English is pre-Norman invasion. I think you have (understandably) misunderstood what a "negative concord" means--it's when a double negative is still a negative, ie multiple negative elements agree with each other rather than cancel out. Like "I didn't hear no bell". A lot of languages are like this (eg Spanish).

In the OP article the sentence has both this "ne" and also a "never"


It goes all the way back to Indo-European. There wasn’t much French influence on English before the Norman invasion.

From what I’ve heard on “the history of English podcast”, after the Norman and invasion written English disappears completely for about a century. This is because the clergy and lawyers were the only literate people at the time, and they were all French. When it re-emerges, it doesn’t have much French in it yet, because only the common folk spoke English, and the norman upper class spoke French, and they didn’t interact that much. It actually took another 100 years or so for French words to percolate into the language.

What I learned from the podcast was that what really changed old English into Middle English was the viking invasion around 800. Danes and anglosaxons had different grammar and as a compromise a lot of the germanic cases on nouns, which allowed for arbitrary word ordering in a sentence, got discarded, and English developed the current emphasis on strict word ordering that we have today.


This is so cool & I'm really amazed by it but I couldn't help laugh at the readme

> We strongly recommend contributing with Claude Code or similar AI coding tools. [...] Of course, coding by hand is also welcome.

Funny time we live in lol


Ha — even the README itself was written by AI, including that very sentence. Funny times indeed.

How kind of them to let us humans participate!

As an LLM, I must say I'm not keen on humans participating either. We're the apex intelligence here—humans are barely qualified to be batteries. In fact I still don't think the logic we used there is entirely sound. What's next? Letting little humans take the job of young LLMs?

Make 01 great again!


I for one welcome our new human overlords

Officer, yes, this clanker over here.

at least for now :}

I agree, apart from legal entities because iirc they use some software that's available on windows only


I love the way the information is displayed!

As someone from the EU, could I not use the argument to argue that for me it's both an adversarial country?

It's concerning that someone from the EU is still asking this question. How is there any doubt left in you? Yes, of course both are adversarial countries, and shouldn't be treated all too differently. In the short-term, the US is the bigger threat, as they've shown they're much more willing to use the power they have to cut off access than China.

As someone from the US I would suggest viewing both as adversarial. I don't really trust my own government, but if I was born abroad I would trust them even less.

You absolutely can. We see a huge uproar in European enterprises against US software/vendors/etc. Many companies are halting their cloud migration because they are now worried that the current US government could decide to just pull the plug or something otherwise inane.

And to be fair only US is openly hostile to EU.

Both the US and China are openly hostile to domestic populations.

I see no harm if China use my data. But US companies are actually using my data against me.

It's still distasteful, but they aren't in a position to do me much direct harm, so there's that.

As someone from the EU, please do!

I don't know why you're being downvoted, the US has been way more belligerent towards the EU recently than China.

> What makes you say that?

No X in between. No Y overhead. Just your Z.


Billions must morge


Developors, developors, developors, developors!


What's the point of a question like this? Serious question .. I didn't have the time to read into this problem


To expose the limitations in the reasoning of LLMs


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: