Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | codechicago277's commentslogin

They should really consider going electric

I used the digits of pi, transposing and changing the order, and got 14% on the original game. Professional poker players will use external sources of randomness to make sure they’re perfectly balancing their positions and not exploitable.

Solving people problems efficiently and effectively.


And having the ability to read the room, understand your audience, and adjust your communication accordingly.


I’ve been buying dvds and surfacing a lot of the content to Jellyfin and Tailscale, it’s a lot easier than it used to be and they even have smart TV apps on some of the platforms. Don’t even have to pirate to get use out of it.


It’s difficult if not impossible to know where to look for edge cases or performance problems without understanding the code.


100% AI on Pangram.

Would be great if we could automatically tag posts that contain a certain level of AI content. If the author couldn’t be bothered to write it in their own words, I can’t be bothered to read it, and at best will have an AI summarize it instead.


The GitHub README has this disclaimer:

Translation Notice: The Korean version of this resource has been translated with the assistance of Gemini. As a result, some phrasing might feel unnatural. We actively welcome improvements and corrections! Please refer to our CONTRIBUTING.md guide to see how you can contribute to making this resource better.

Assuming this means the Korean is the original, I'm curious how much effort was put into the Korean text and whether it reads naturally and maintains thematic unity. A serious book on this subject matter would fill a valuable need right now


Takes two seconds to see it too. Example:

> Here is a highly realistic PyTorch implementation of the EP Dispatch phase

No one in their right mind would use "highly realistic" here.


Pangram flags this post as 100% AI


> In AI Engineer postings the skill "prompt engineering" appears 8.9% of the time, RAG 13.6%. *The skill stayed, the job dissolved into other roles*.

That is Claude vibe. I thought it was an ok article when I was about half way through it, then hit this. And overall it seems like it could have been more focused, it listed various AI roles a bit carelessly.


Don’t need any tool to identify this as slop:

> Here is the short version, with numbers and links.

> The one-paragraph summary:


Getting 11% AI on Pangram, which isn’t bad tbh.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElonJet

Turns out only one of the major platforms banned this account…


They were already heavily limited and essentially useless by then, definitely not enough access to sync your profile to another network.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: