So murder someone who wasn't involved in a purported rape because he at some point in the past introduced a purported victim to the purported rapist.
There's so much wrong with this purported claim whose purpose is likely to be the misdirection of justice ...
CrazyBob was murdered. The murderer has been convicted. The conviction does not, in any way, undo the loss, but justice is still a necessary element in the preservation of our society.
May justice be swift and appropriate. And may the family and friends finally find room for healing.
I remember when Levo started this project. At the time, he was getting fed up with the various editors that he was using while he was working on his compiler. He didn't like any non-responsiveness or slow-downs when he was trying to look at a file, whether it was a big dump of something, or XML, or whatever. He asked "How hard could it be to just write a working editor that doesn't freeze up with big files or scrolling?" and I joked that it shouldn't take more than 3 days to build. That must have been close to a year ago.
The software industry is getting harder and harder to do a start-up in, or even a self-sustaining open source project in, especially in the dev tools space. Levo's been trying to figure out how such a thing might be possible: Is there a way to build things like this, full time, and still be able to pay the rent?
I don't think I've ever posted any articles on Lobsters, but there are a bunch of users there that use the "report" feature any time that they see a post that doesn't support their own personal opinion. That aspect of the site does get old, fast.
But most of the users there are cool. Unfortunately, it only takes a few bad users to make the experience of posting uncomfortable.
There's a URL for each user that shows their standing. Any recent (last 30 days) reports are listed there. You can't tell who reported you, but you can tell what they were complaining about (which post, what reason they gave).
The URL is reddit-like, i.e. /u/username/standing
The problem is that there's a downside to being reported, but there's apparently no downside to reporting people. Since there's no down-voting of comments on lobsters, and since reporting comments is apparently free and unlimited, some people seem to use it as their down-vote. And since it's anonymous (the reporting person's name isn't included in the report to the person being reported), and since reporting appears to have no limits or downsides, it inevitably creates some twisted incentives.
I currently have no "reports" there, but that's because I (mostly) learned my lesson: Post your own opinion at your own risk. i.e. You'd better make sure that your opinions aren't unpopular with any users there, and particularly not with the dominant group.
I think someone else mentioned that the things that they posted that were reported, were also the things that received many more upvotes. I can personally confirm this from my own history. However, I don't find this surprising: If something evokes a response that could cause someone to upvote it, it shouldn't be surprising that it would evoke a response that could cause someone to report it. And receiving kudos for an opinion does not absolve that opinion of the responsibility to adhere to the rules and standards of the site.
Coincidentally (and AFAIK not related to this thread here), I did have a comment moderated (i.e. deleted) within the last 24 hours. I'm of mixed feelings on the rationale for the moderation. It's a thread that contains highly-upvoted comments like "I hope those responsible get sued to oblivion. This kind of stuff should result in a corporate death penalty." My comment was: "Just waiting for a case like this to make it up to the US Supreme Court so they can rule that it’s a constitutional right of companies to do this." Apparently, my post was "political". (I can only assume that the "political" aspect was my implication that non-human legal entities like corporations should not be granted legal rights by SCOTUS that expropriate or otherwise displace the rights of actual human beings.) The thread: https://lobste.rs/s/8igrxm/train_firmware_reverse_engineerin...
On the other hand, I do agree that some portion of the topic is very technical in nature (and the technical aspects are interesting), and it's hard to discuss that portion of the topic if people are constantly commenting about relevant aspects of the legal system or whatever. So since the post wasn't specifically about the legal aspects (or "political" aspects, if you insist), I can kind of see the point of the moderation.
That’s the natural conclusion to draw when factually accurate information is repeatedly censored in support of establishment narratives:
This isn’t about “misinformation” but suppressing voices which challenge the government narrative — especially when the “official” narrative is misinformation.
For context: VCs make much more money by flipping money-losing concerns that have high growth rates, than by building profitable companies. The resulting behavior is predictable.
That TSS in Boston was an amazing confluence of people, mostly all unknown at the time! There was: You, Gavin, Bob, Mike Cannon-Brookes, Marc Fleury, Neelan Choski, Patrick Linskey, and at least a dozen other notables, all who went on to have outsized impact on our industry.
You were one of his favorite people that he ever got to work with. Even years later he couldn't stop gushing about how proud he was of you. No exaggeration.
There's so much wrong with this purported claim whose purpose is likely to be the misdirection of justice ...
CrazyBob was murdered. The murderer has been convicted. The conviction does not, in any way, undo the loss, but justice is still a necessary element in the preservation of our society.
May justice be swift and appropriate. And may the family and friends finally find room for healing.