No “long pole” either.

How does that diminish the observation about Amodei?

My feeds are full of ads by gaming pc makers now renting out gaming pcs for a monthly fee. NZXT calls it a lease with a 2 year refresh.

You will own nothing and be happy.

You are splitting hairs. End result is the same.

No it’s not. Saying “I won’t talk about how to make bombs” is not the same as “the holocaust didn’t happen”.

Except he referred to him as G.J. Chesterton.

I hear he was good friends with H.F. Wells.

I heard he used to annoy Chesterton by walking into the club and announcing loudly "Herbert Fucking Wells Is In Da House!"

I heard he would prank him by taking down his fence.

It’s a tell now. I see it I assume AI and disregard.

Throw a chess board on there. See how it does. It always gets pieces and positions completely wrong because it’s terrible at analyzing images.

They will be serfs reliant on US and Chinese models to provide protection for their technological infrastructure from AI exploits.

Read enough posts on LinkedIn and you’ll be a trained expert in spotting that slop.

I feel like it’s changing my brain. A colleague uses AI to make some code change and submits a PR. I use AI to evaluate the PR. It’s like AIs talking to each other with humans serving as conduits or connectors. Sometimes I’ll look up from the screen and realize how strange it is.

Do you ever actually think during this process? or could I train a monkey to do this same activity with the same outcomes?

Of course I think. I have 20 years of coding experience and knowledge of the codebase and business. That’s why I’m keenly aware of how strange the process is.

What I’d like to know is how you’d train a monkey to read and judge output from an llm on a pull request.