On occasion, I've fired up pandas just to sanitize a CSV file and drop malformed rows as preparation to bulk ingesting into a database:
import pandas as pd
pd.read_csv('bad_file.csv', error_bad_lines=False).to_csv('good_file.csv')
It's not efficient (reads everything into memory), but read_csv is robust when it comes to handling embedded unescaped quotes/commas/etc., and supports dropping rows with the incorrect number of columns due to anomalies it can't handle.
I would love to be able to search all code for a string and then either (1) sort the resulting repositories by stars/forks; or (2) limit the results to repositories with >X stars/forks. When learning a new framework or library I like to find popular projects that use it and read the code to get a sense of conventions, architecture, etc. For instance, it'd be fantastic to find all repositories with over 20 stars containing a *.py file with "import flask" or "from flask" in them.
Unfortunately, you can search code by file extension and phrase, and you can use advanced search to search for repository descriptions filtering by stars, but I don't believe you can do both at once.
For instance, searching for "flask" and limiting the results to >1000 stars returns only the 27 repositories with a matching description[0], but the code search returns over 4 million results, ignoring the stars parameter[1].
How would you build the search results UI for a grouped query like this? If one repository has 10k stars and has 1000 files with matching strings, should the first 1000 results be from the same repository?
In addition, I haven't seen the third step in the "Cue -> Habit -> Reward" cycle mentioned yet. While the Reward may be the lingering endorphin rush from a hard workout or the feeling of accomplishment after finishing a chore, the author also suggests a simple, pleasurable behavior after the task that you're trying to make a habit of (like a small piece of chocolate immediately after a run or allowing yourself a few shameless minutes of cat videos after a focused study session). The idea is to allow your mind to associate the pleasure response with the habit each time it encounters the cue.
> I haven't seen the third step in the "Cue -> Habit -> Reward" cycle mentioned yet.
Good point! I allow myself an Irn-Bru only on run days (and less than 10 miles doesn't count). I don't live in Scotland and Irn-Bru is particularly hard to find, which is part of the incentive. Gives me a sense of accomplishment anyway!
