reblog of https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/08/09/windows-11s-weather... which should be the link

yeah. The GA post reads like a less addled version of Yegge, but the same genre.

> Only if you can reasonably separate LLM from non LLM code, which is in no way a solved problem.

It's trivial to detect when someone's coding with a chatbot - they tell you, repeatedly.

Nobody who doesn't code with a chatbot worries that it's hard to tell.

Apparently some people have compared it to some other unlikable groups of people (I know this because a vibecoder complained about the comparison someone else made)

If someone has to ask whether their software is mostly AI-written, then it is.

If someone has to ask exactly how racist you have to be before you can be called a nazi, they're probably a nazi.

If someone has to ask how attracted to underage girls they can be before they're a pedophile, they're a pedophile.

If someone has to ask how responsible you have to be for a death before it's a murder, they're probably a murderer.

Because people who aren't these things clearly know that they aren't.

yeah I use vp9 with opus for uploads by choice, it's great!

YouTube serves vp9 but it always re-encodes my videos as AV1. Annoying.

(I would upload as AV1 but the encoder is slooooooooow.)

> (I would upload as AV1 but the encoder is slooooooooow.)

If you're using libaom, try switching to libsvtav1. It's still slow, but it's slooow instead of slooooooooow.

ssh -D

(really, that's what I do)

Kai Lentit just dropped a video on precisely this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E7kBOH9owI

I heartily endorse the Fuck You Pay Me support process.

The discussion around this topic is plagued with internet tough guy attorneys at LOL threatening Johannes Link with all manner of legal retribution.

If that's not what you're doing, I look forward to hearing your action plan.

I'm seeing protesting AI fans and cheering AI haters. As far as I can tell, this is enhancing trust in the non-LLM users. Why would you think it wasn't?

Where are the cheering AI haters showing up for this one? How does this enhance trust in the non-LLM users?

Let's say a maintainer of an open-source project decided they hated Linux and added a check that, when run on Linux, the project would run `rm -rf <some directory of your code that is relevant to the project>`. Would you trust that person not to do other unreasonable things in the future?

What if, right, what if Roko's Basilisk responded to a prompt injection and blew up the WORLD, huh? What then? That'd be pretty messed up!

Back here in reality, please show me evidence that any AI agent deleted a single byte on jqwik's say-so.

I'm seeing the cheering AI haters showing up on Mastodon, fwiw. This story is today's secondary main character, the main one being rsync falling to vibe code.

> no one will use your tools anymore.

pretty obviously, no one who he's stated repeatedly he doesn't want to use the tool will use his tools any more. But there are more coders in the world than ardent AI users.