Clicking the back button and having it work as expected was nice, also.

It’s a clear spoonerism.

Out of curiosity I tried doing it to itself, and googled pooner schism. Which google ai confidently explained was a schism on /lgbt/ about pooner memes. Now kinda curious whether it's a hallucination or not and I'm kinda scared of diving deep enough into this rabbit hole to find out.

In the near future, your mandated Super Intelligent Government Grok Space XPhone / ankle brace will give you whatever rabbit holes it thinks you need.

Can, or should?

I can’t be bothered to check the exact assembly to see if timing attacks are possible.

But crypto really is just a small thing. I’m not going to design a nuclear reactor but I’ll definitely do stuff that depends on the electricity from one. Similarly one can still do their own authentication; its not like even Apple forgot to rate limit…

My hope for such an event is mostly to bring tech leadership types back down to planet earth and to get them to shut up for a few minutes. There are a lot of AI charlatans who need to be humbled by the markets so the serious folks among us can get back to doing real work.

ETA: I also guess I sort of hope for it because this whole cycle has felt so incredibly irrational that I desire a small return to sanity, even if it comes at the cost of some of my retirement.

I was going to echo the same. I'm less bothered by the hype than the vagueness of it all. Use AI, management doesn't know what for, figure it out. Also, prove productivity gains somehow, we're not sure how to do that, figure that out as well. Figure out AI security too, we saw a scary article about that.

I dare say my retirement would appreciate the buying opportunity a bear market would afford, provided I get to stay employed.

Ha! I can relate. I have cash set aside for just such an occasion. It's that second part that's the tricky bit, eh?

ApoB is no doubt responsve to medication, but my understanding is that diet and exercise can't get anywhere close to achieving that 85% number.

Behavioral changes can only do so much to lower ApoB. It is a meaningful marker and may trigger additional workup. It may also signal that you should at least consider a statin.

ApoA is completely out of your control and will not change with behavioral modification.

So, no, you're incorrect that these tests are superfluous and all you need to say is "diet and exercise". Besides, even if that was always the answer to these results, you should still have a baseline to see if behavioral modification is doing anything.

Sources? That 1% number is in my understanding wildly incorrect for statins, if that's what you're referring to. Are you comparing use of statins for people who already are low risk for heart attack over the next 10 years?

Just vaguely remember what my cardiologist told me. This is absolute, not relative. Which, and I'm definitely not saying it's insignificant.

I don't think pairing, nor TDD come anywhere close to the abdication of responsibility that agentic programming does.

I had a similar take, but I was wrong.

How were you wrong? Out of 15k targets scanned they arrived at 25 servers total.