Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dieulot's commentslogin

The issue of rootless malicious command overrides is solved by typing the whole path, such as "/bin/sudo".

No, don't do that as a precaution. As others have already answered correctly - it's too late to worry about such things if a malicious agent has write access to your ${HOME} dir.


Certbot does too as of 4.0.0 (2025-04-08).


This is due to one of your AAAA records: ::ffff:157.245.83.16. (The other one is fine.)

CLI:

    dig aaaa saile.it
    curl -v --resolve "saile.it:443:[2a04:4e42:2::775]" "https://saile.it/1145-pull-requests-per-day/"
    curl -v --resolve "saile.it:443:[::ffff:157.245.83.16]" "https://saile.it/1145-pull-requests-per-day/"
GUI:

- https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=saile.it

- https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/dig/


To be more explicit: asking [email protected] why some submission vanished in a mysterious way does bring a clear answer in my experience.


HTTP/2 “pipelining” (multiplexing) is still there and works as intended; but bundling is still much more efficient.

This article delves into just that: https://csswizardry.com/2023/10/the-three-c-concatenate-comp... The first pair of waterfall graphics illustrates the problem clearly.

(What you vaguely remember as not working as intended is probably Server Push).


> Craig Federighi […] merging iOS and macOS team together.

What year was that?


In the absence of someone giving you a better answer, my hazy memory says 2015 or early 2016?

Given what we know about Apple's hardware platform direction, on hindsight, it seemed like a good strategy. Note: I am talking about the team merging, not merging macOS and iOS themselves.


It was 2016. Right after I quit.



Has someone automated this yet? I mean archive every post then post the archive link if the post is "hugged-to-death"?


another WP site that goes down with the tiniest amount of load. seen it too many times.


any website that asks me to prove im not a robot can f off, i dont need to see it that badly - unless i do, but hopefully thats rare.


No because that additional CSS file can only be fetched after the initial HTML file has been fetched, not simultaneously; thus requiring another roundtrip to the server. (HTTP/2 Server Push promised otherwise but it was never implemented correctly.)

Latency being much more constraining than bandwidth, embedding a stylesheet that’s small is nearly always the correct tradeoff.


“<file foo” is POSIX: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/V... (see the absence of mention that redirection needs to be after the command)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: