Not to put words in their mouth, but it seems like they mean they used to think about a problem and then spend X minutes typing the solution in via the keyboard that they no longer have to do.
I hadn't watched these before, but wow the AI wars are no joke. "Betrayal", "Deception", "Violation", "Treachery"... It's like the Cola Wars, but 10x more personal.
When I first saw these titles I thought they were cheesey. Then I started to appreciate the advertising team's distillation of the core user pain point into a single word at the intro. Completely changed my initial perspective!
One mitigation might be to use one company's model to check the work of another company's code and depend on market competition to keep the checks and balances.
Then how many models deep do you go before it's more cost effective to just hire a junior dev, supply them with a list of common backdoors, and have them scan the code?
That would be the more general/traditional way of saying it, but in modern investment circles the focus seems to have turned towards the actual people being "bulls/bears" and not just the attitudes of the market. A person is a bull or a bear, as opposed to a person being either bullish or bearish.
So in this construction, a "bull case" is a "case that a bull (the person) can make".
>Without knowing the numbers it's hard to tell if the business model for these AI providers actually works
It'll be interesting to see what OpenAI and Anthropic will tell us about this when they go public (seems likely late this year--along with SpaceX, possibly)
reply