Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | doener's commentslogin



Of course just guessing here on the ground of how I see Altman‘s behavior until now: I think 99% PR.


Recessions without an external shock are rare. But you could say the rest of the economy is in stagnation. I‘m expecting real recession as soon as the LLM bubble begins to burst.

The catch is: The servers are not managed. SSH instead of mouse clicks.

There are so many articles like these:

"We Moved from AWS to Hetzner. Cut Costs 89%. Here’s the Catch."

https://medium.com/lets-code-future/we-moved-from-aws-to-het...


You just linked AI slop.

You mean the image? The text does not sound like AI at all IMHO.

> No theory. No fluff. Just production.

ChatGPT tells me "no theory, no fluff" all the time :D


Where do you think it learned that phrasing from?

Not from people using that same phrasing twice within a few sentences.

""" No warning. No traffic spike. Just… more money gone.

That’s when I finally looked at Hetzner.

I’ve seen too many backend systems fail for the same reasons — and too many teams learn the hard way.

So I turned those incidents into a practical field manual: real failures, root causes, fixes, and prevention systems.

No theory. No fluff. Just production. """

It's clearly slop, they immediately use effectively the same one again:

""" That last line isn’t a joke. There were charges I genuinely couldn’t explain. Elastic IPs we forgot to release. Snapshots from instances that no longer existed. CloudFront distributions someone set up for testing. """

No, human writers don't repeat this pattern every single paragraph. They use it at most across in a whole article.


Repetition is a very common tool in writing (ie 'I have a dream').

I'm just irked that it's being called out for AI slop because "I feel it in my bones!!"

There's a good chance it was written using AI -- should that matter? If the content is wrong/sucks, say that instead. If you're going to dismiss all AI assisted writing: good luck in the next decade.


Reading the same (very annoying marketing blog) style of writing gets old fast.

It’s like suddenly all memes are just the same meme and nobody makes their own memes because “AI does it better”.

The style of writing is an intrinsic part of communication, if you can’t critique that then what is content? We’re not machines sharing pieces of data with each other.


AI-written text is not necessarily incorrect, but if the author did not take their time to remove the AI slop, they probably did not put much effort into it elsewhere. In addition, the text is often over two times longer than without the slop, which disrespects the reader's time (even worse in this case, since a significant fraction of the article is an ad for the author's books).

"Unfortunately, the [Hetzner] CPX22is available only in eu-central and ap-southeast, but if that’s OK with you it is the best value and fastest overall."

Whenever you think this hole Trump fever dream cannot get even more absurd and abyssal something like this appears.

TIL: Slashdot still exists. And it looks exactly as horrible as 20 years ago.

I mean so does HN

HN is minimalist, not horrible. And the content is good!

Well this particular comment thread isn't "good". If you think so, then maybe you should try reddit.

All that VC money couldn't buy an accessibility expert apparently

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: