Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | doublepg23's commentslogin

The underlying tech is already compromised on the Android side.

https://lobste.rs/s/4netv1/c2pa_cameras_do_not_survive_conta...


I was saying the same to my friend.

PA has very strict two party consent wiretap laws I'm not sure this feature would clear.


I'm just sad they never sent me the Google Maps socks :-(

> In which country do fast food workers get higher salaries than office workers, unless we are talking about tourism industry outside Europe, with said workers getting tips in Euros and Dollars instead of local currency?

https://buc-ees.com/careers/


As an anecdote from the States: During July 4th our city had some poor weather and the best way to check the status of any celebrations going on was their Twitter page.

Yup, I get 1-3ms to 1.1.1.1 and 18-20ms to Google from a semi-local fiber provider.

Definitely blew my mind coming from the ~20ms DOCSIS adds.


UniFi and Cloudflare have interesting design philosophies where every time I load them up there's an entirely new experience waiting for me.

Just yesterday I was configuring my UniFi and being confused on where I can actually find everything in the new UI. I swear the firewall/policy UX changes every version.

Many things divide us here: Wawa or Sheetz; cheesesteaks or pierogi; Eagles or Steelers; but I very glad we could come together on this.

[flagged]


Concerns about noise pollution and increased electricity costs are just morons?

What about concerns about air pollution from unregulated diesel generators? Or using large amounts of water in drought prone areas?


All of those can be addressed by proper regulation. Banning them outright is the equivalent of banning all immigration just because there's some particular subgroup that people hate.

> All of those can be addressed by proper regulation.

No it can't. Regulation is already being flouted.

> Banning them outright is the equivalent of banning all immigration

Please be less obvious, this is just insulting.


>No it can't. Regulation is already being flouted.

So regulations to ban datacenters work, but for some reason regulations to ban gas turbines or whatever doesn't work?

>Please be less obvious, this is just insulting.

Please be less obvious. You failing to rebut my argument and resorting to calling it "just insulting" is insulting.


> So regulations to ban datacenters work

Yes, as we see here.

> regulations to ban gas turbines or whatever doesn't work?

Yes, as we've seen elsewhere.

Anything else you're not clear on?


I wouldn’t be so coarse, but mostly yes. Data centres are hardly new, and the subset of legitimate criticisms problems are hardly unique.

so what you're saying is that the problems people have with new data centers are real and well-documented?

> Data centres are hardly new

A commenter below quotes a 73% annual growth rate vs. 23% over the prior decade.

You don't think that'd have an effect on people's perception?


Perception, absolutely yes.

And physical, objective reality, too.

It’s all just feelings, based on observations affected by hundreds of variables entirely unrelated to one particular type of industrial construction.

Start paying closer attention to the news and make note of when facts are cherry picked to suit sentiment… and then ask yourself where the origin of the sentiment is.


Damn their lying eyes!

Care to expand?

Others already have elsewhere in this discussion.

I oppose AI data centers the way they are being rolled out (which is not the same as I'm against data centers as a concept). Just like I'm anti "AI as it is being pushed", not against AI as a technology.

I'm not a moron. I do know what I'm talking about most of the time.


>99% of the time

99% is an interesting figure because that's roughly how much my energy bill has increased despite no significant change in my usage due to data center demand on the grid


Buddy I work in world class premier data centers and I don’t want more of ‘em either. I appreciate that you think I’m a moron though for wanting to protect my community from douchebags like yourself. But respectfully I reject your bullshit.

They can't engage with your ideas, so they try to label you as the kind of person whose ideas aren't worth engaging with. It doesn't matter to them what you said, it must be wrong because you said it. Unless, of course, you agree with them, in which case you suddenly become worth taking seriously again.

Ain’t that the truth!

I didn't even know I was using .name incorrectly...

Safari + the Content Blocker Wipr works well for me.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: