She isn't a doctor or a pharmacologist! Why would you even value her opinion when it is confirmed that testosterone has potent psychoactive effects? I don't care if she's the space pope of the galactic bridge federation, her opinion is voided by biological fact.
The animated / adjustable versions of such images (or even videos!) are much more terrifying, because you can very clearly see that this is not the case.
I gave around $10 to the FSF (in person), and donate all my old clothes to local homeless shelters. I prefer charity to be done directly. Otherwise, I can't really see what is going on with the money.
Honestly, it sounds like the "recruiter" may not even be arranging an interview with an interested company. Perhaps they are trying to get gullible clients to fly in on their own dime to interview with the recruiter? As other commenters have noted in large numbers, this is not normal operating procedure for any real company, and thus my intuition is they are not offering an interview with a real company.
That's the beauty of having a large sample size. There are examples everywhere.
Look at political parties which imposed forms of quotas e.g. UK and Australian Labour. They have extremely high levels of female MPs versus alternative parties. Or look at corporate boards and executives across many countries. Almost all have seen improvements in female participation:
Isn't that pretty much tautological? Yes, if you impose gender quota, then you're obviously going to get more women. The empirical question is whether the organization is better off as a result.
Meanwhile in other threads we often discuss how the hiring process is broken for technical positions - what makes us think that hiring in other fields is any better?
