I happen to live in China now and lots of my friends work in frontier labs. I don't now there's a restriction for major updates of LLMs.
Western media doesn't have correct informtion source about China. This is because Western favors Web ecosystem and most inforamtion live in the Web, but in China everyone use Apps.
Plethora means an excessive amount, so I disagree.
Adding formats to the browser gives us more code to maintain, increases the binary size, and increases the attack surface area. That's why, at Firefox, we insisted on a Rust decoder.
> gives us more code to maintain, increases the binary size
In that case, don't nanny everything as a monolith. Let formats/codecs can be installed as extension/plugin.
For example I really want to webrtc to f' off, I can't. I can't even disable it for a particular site like microphone permissions. It sucks!
And to my knowledge, webrtc stack is so much more complicated than an image format, so many sites trying to grab my private IP using webrtc. yet every browser vendor are happy to support it!
Browser vendors want their browser to be safe to use. If we encourage users to essentially bake their own browser from a hodge podge of unverified third party code running at high privilege, we don't meet that goal.
An image codec can be run in a sandboxed way, with a preset cpu/ram boundary, the output is rastered pixels, how could this not be "safe"?
There are dozens of .wasm based image encoder/decoders outthere, no?
It's not like it could access network or IO, unlike extensions do, which could steal your data after authors sell their popular extension and buys profits from stealing data from installed users.
We have the data. How would you like us to present it? (Bonus point if you can tell me why that will be helpful because that will help me to make a better pitch to engineering!)
reply